Intake (noob question)

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
magus
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:42 am

Post

im wondering what the difference in hp and throttle response would be between a shiny new $200 injen intake or just a simple $50 cone filter with a MAF adapter. I figure that the cone filter is whats bringing more air into the engine but I dont see the advantage to new piping. so, is the injen just for looks or is there a performance difference between the stock plastic piping and the pipe injen uses?


User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

MINIMAL IN MY OWN EXPERIENCES, I'D SAY 1-2HP MAX.

User avatar
PROJECTRB240SX
Posts: 3673
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 5:33 pm
Car: 1972 DATSUN 240Z W/ SR20DET

Post

THATS RWHP ENGINE HP IS DIFFERENT

User avatar
drift-sx
Posts: 190
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 6:22 pm

Post

when i talked to a guy at a aperformance shop he told me that 240 intakes were disigned really well thats why not all manufacuers make the whole shiny pipe assembly cause the 240's don't need it, they said that mostly for show, but i can't complain with show its always good to have a nice looking car

User avatar
quiksilvia
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 7:09 am
Car: 95 s14 se
Contact:

Post

plus the injen gives the carb eo number. making it smog legal, but the knn gives the carb eo, deeper sound, and its easy to install and maintain, plus its cheaper

User avatar
Jookmasta
Posts: 5172
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:26 pm

Post

if money is an issue, look into aem intakes. they are about fifty to seventy less than the injen, and it has a pipe also.

TomsMR2
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 8:44 pm
Car: cars.. etc

Post

200 for a ****ty metal pipe? for that price you might as well bend over and grab your ankles because you're already getting f-'d!

you can make your own for $25 in mandrel pipe material, $6 in connectors, and $20-30 for the filter.

U12 2NR
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 4:29 am

Post

I'll admit $200 is far too much for an intake. But lets take a look at what a performance intake does and why in some ways it's worth the money.

1.) Smooth ONE piece mandrel bent pipe instead of rippled plastic factory piping. The ripples cause turbulance, which slow down the velocity of the air. Sure you can build your own connecting multiple mandrel pieces together, but each of those connections slow the air down (very minimal). 2) Pre made intakes aready fit perfectly, so you don't have to hack your arse away all day. They mount properly so it doesn't move around while you're driving. They also have the proper bungs to attach your vacuum hoses onto. 3) They come with a high flowing air filter. Sure you can go buy a terrific blue cone filter from autor zone, but does it flow better than a k&n? If a filter does flow better, does it filter well? 4) It's polished. I don't know about you, but when I pop my hood for someone I don't want them to see hacked up metal tubing with plumbing connectors. 5) Buying 3" mandrel bent aluminum tubing is not cheap. Sure you can buy 3" mandrel bent mild steel pipes, but for the the added weight and heat retention I would stick with aluminum. Not to mention if you don't paint the mild steel it'll rust on you. If you don't paint it well it looks like arse.

unless you have the experience to put together something really well, you should just save up until you can afford to buy a new intake or even a used one. Trying to rig your first intake together will just make you mess up the material and all the money you spent on supplies goes down the drain. I can totally understand making your own intake for a car that has no aftermarket one available.

TomsMR2
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 8:44 pm
Car: cars.. etc

Post

if you think the additional 2 or 3 lbs a steel intake adds, you truely are a weight nazi.. the weight difference is soooo marginal!

if you take some time, it wont look like ***. all the pipes ive made look very good. 200 for a metal pipe is just outrageous.

User avatar
Jookmasta
Posts: 5172
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:26 pm

Post

140 shipped for an aem. just my two cents

U12 2NR
Posts: 367
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 4:29 am

Post

TomsMR2 wrote:if you think the additional 2 or 3 lbs a steel intake adds, you truely are a weight nazi.. the weight difference is soooo marginal!


There are people who rely on weight reduction to be faster, check out http://www.sr20deforum.com, there are quite a few guys there that are into serious weight reduction (running 13's with minor bolt on's and weight reduction). As a matter of fact anyone in their right senses should try their best to conserve weight. Why put more weight onto the car than necessary? To be slower? In addition, I also mentioned that weight is not the only downfall to a steel intake, steel retains heat more than aluminum, which defeats the "cold air intake". In any case, weight is just one minor point.
TomsMR2 wrote:if you take some time, it wont look like ***. all the pipes ive made look very good. 200 for a metal pipe is just outrageous.


I'm sure you're capable of crafting magnificent intakes, but it's not wise, in my opinion, to tell people to make their own intakes when they might not have any experience. It's just asking them to throw away money that could have been used on a pre-made intake.

Also, jookmasta pointed out that AEM's intake is available for $140. :oface

L337 H4x012s
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 3:09 pm

Post

which is better for a 1990 the aem or the K&n?


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”