dldjros69 wrote:Well thank you for spelling that out for me. That was the first time i saw that in that much detail. (the sentra lost alot of torque at low rpms, ill take my my hp and keep my torque where its at.
At least they seem somewhat honest.
Also i dont put all my stock in the fact that Nissan/car makers put all their R&D into every part. That is why after market communities/companies exist. Some times cars are detuned to not compete with their more expensive big brother or maybe to keep things smoother or quieter. It could also be more cost effective for nissan/car makers to produce part x that yields 5 hp vs part y that yields 10 hp but cost twice as much.
Bingo! You are now looking at the big picture. You are right about the R&D comment. This is not like a NASCAR team's engine R&D, who are constantly for more HP for their team's race cars.
Look at the main competitors in the Altima class: Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Chevy Malibu. Checking the manufactures stats, they all are rated at about the same HP, give or take a few HP.
None of the manufactures want to be low man on the totum pole of HP, so they do what they need to do, within a budget, to stay competitive with each other. Why do you think that Honda increased the displacement of the Accord V-6, from 3.0L to 3.5L ? Because they were out horse powered by their competition is one reason. Nissan and Toyota hd 3.5L in their cars.
A good example of maximum HP, without a turbo, is the 2.2L I-4 in the Honda S-2000 2 seat sports car.
The engine is rated at 237 HP @ 7800 RPM, with a redline of 8000 RPM.
The engine is rated at 162 ft. lbs. of torque @ 6800 RPM.
Road test reports say that the car is a rocket, but only at high RPM. The engine make so little torque at low RPM's, that the driver is constantly shifting the 6 speed transmission to keep the RPM's up into the range where the torque and HP live. The car is relatively lightweight, at around 2900 lbs, which of course helps with acceleration. The car performs well at what it was designed for.
What would happen if a manufacture put a high revving, high HP, low torque engine in a family 4 door sedan? I'll tell you what would happen. The road tests reports would be awful, the average consumer, who does not drive a car at redline, would demand their money back because they would claim the the car is a 'dog' the way they drive it. They would rightfully complain that the car was underpowered.
Read the comments in the exhaust thread. Comments I have read say that some cat back systems may increase maximum HP at redline, but they reduce torque at normal driving speeds and RPM.
Maximum horsepower is a great thing to strive for, but not at the expense of torque, IF you drive your car on the street.
Take care,Leonard T.