i beg to differ.PoorManQ45 wrote:This is not in reference to anything in particular.
Nah, just a general reminder to people.numbnuts240 wrote:i beg to differ.PoorManQ45 wrote:This is not in reference to anything in particular.
You mean this isn't in reference to the Assassins thread I just closed?PoorManQ45 wrote:This is not in reference to anything in particular.
HAHAHAHAPoorManQ45 wrote:This is not in reference to anything in particular.
That was not my intentions. It is coincidental.Pwnin O'Brien wrote:You mean this isn't in reference to the Assassins thread I just closed?PoorManQ45 wrote:This is not in reference to anything in particular.
I love you.93coupe wrote:Awesomeness
93coupe wrote:This does not reference anyone in particular.
Why do people not understand that they are complete fail bucket a$$? Do you ever wish that some people just were never born? I do, a lot actually, particularly when cream pie guzzling Floridians find it necessary to go through life with self induced down syndrome.
Yes, public information is out there but that does not mean it is appropriate to search it out and post it where it need not be posted.
Stop being a douche bad. Now you can go back to scratching your balls and smelling your hand or picking your boogers and flicking them.
I hope NICO members remember to not be so f*** gay.
-Ryan
Unfortunately appropriate and legal don't go hand in hand. By uploading information to the internet you are allowing anyone and everyone to use that information as they please, within legal boundaries.93coupe wrote: Yes, public information is out there but that does not mean it is appropriate to search it out and post it where it need not be posted.
-Ryan
It's totally mutual, seriously. I miss your face.AppleBonker wrote:I love you.93coupe wrote:Awesomeness
You do bring up a valid point. If the court house makes information available to the public in what ways can you use this information?RustyBucket wrote:Yes, there is plenty of information about people publically available on the internet.
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not a lawyer and am certianly not familiar with the US legal system. Speaking In light of a certian recently locked thread, posting links to information, even if it is publically avaiable, that is then used for the purposes of harassment could more than likely land yourself in some legal trouble.
PoorManQ45 wrote:
You do bring up a valid point. If the court house makes information available to the public in what ways can you use this information?

PoorManQ45 wrote:You do bring up a valid point. If the court house makes information available to the public in what ways can you use this information?RustyBucket wrote:Yes, there is plenty of information about people publically available on the internet.
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not a lawyer and am certianly not familiar with the US legal system. Speaking In light of a certian recently locked thread, posting links to information, even if it is publically avaiable, that is then used for the purposes of harassment could more than likely land yourself in some legal trouble.
"Hey, this guy lives at xyz".
The person only told the address goes and robs the place. Are you liable?
reminds me of the with all due respect bit off of Talledega Nights. With all due respect you can kiss my a**.PoorManQ45 wrote:This is not in reference to anything in particular.
Why yes, yes there is.fiznowler wrote:Isn't there a forum rule about starting a new thread because one was locked?