Post by
Warpkor »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/warpkor-u50796.html
Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:28 am
Originally, I spoke to the service advisor about the false statements on the the report. If the tech actually had viewed the HEPA filter, he should have noted it was in brand new condition. Response, keying error on the report. Following up on the false statements regarding the transmission fluid, etc., the advisor spoke over my voice indicating the issue as being related to the age and mileage of the car. I pointed out that the language on the report specifically relates to "inspection", observation, and "found to be...", and the advisor quickly deflected the issue and would have nothing more to say.
I had the chance to complete an email survey taking the opportunity to express appreciation for my advisor's professionalism and efficiency but I also noted the false statements on the inspection report. The dealership has called twice though I haven't responded. I think I'll let them stew over it a bit. The last voice mail again reiterated that the report findings were as a result of the cars age and mileage.
From my perspective, there is no argument that the report findings were false. The dealership's business tactics are unethical. Changing the language on the report and thus the consumer expectation is the only ethical way to address this issue.
I hope that the service completed on my car was actually done correctly. Their credibility is quite suspect.