In 2012, he'll be Mahatma

[AZhitman]

Gandhi, that is... Get it? Gone-dee? HAHAHHAAHAHA... I kill me.

Anyway, speaking of Gandhi, apparently he had more to do with the Presidency than all you silly people who cast a vote in 2009:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 889833.cms

[audtatious]

So, if Gandhi was one who helped propel him to the Presidency.....how did he end up in a church being taught by a ultra-leftist racist? Seems the opposite of what Gandhi was?

[IBCoupe]

What vote did we cast in 2009?

[audtatious]

The ones that were found in closets and trunks from 2008?

[n00b240]

The ones that were found in closets and trunks from 2008?

Apparently those had been hidden from 2000 When Gore "won," they changed the Names around, and suddenly Obama got a ton of votes

[mattblancarte]

Anyway, speaking of Gandhi, apparently he had more to do with the Presidency than all you silly people who cast a vote in 2009

Taken in its literal form, this is a logically true statement.

Voters in 2009 would have had zero affect on the election, thus giving any sliver of influence from Gandhi the upper hand.

[IBCoupe]

You win, sir!

[AZhitman]

<-- fails at math.

[heliochrome85]

thats one post you wont ever see isaac make.

[audtatious]

The ones that were found in closets and trunks from 2008?

Apparently those had been hidden from 2000 When Gore "won," they changed the Names around, and suddenly Obama got a ton of votes

We all know the Dems never really lose, they just bribe away from the sidelines