I'm building it for some parking lot fun, lol. I pretty much just want it for sliding and having fun, lol. It will see street use as well though.kyhunter89 wrote:What are you building the car for?
ME... I'd buy the cheapest coupe and put an lq4 with 243 heads and a t56
for 7500.... find a car thats already built....
Yes. Not enough options and thread is redundant x1million.duffman1278 wrote:I would use the money instead to pay a moderator to shut this thread down.

Fanboys never cease to amaze me... You're arguing displacement with 4 cylinders, and did you really just say better gear ratios? They run the same gear ratio. The only difference is 5th. I don't know about you, but I don't do much racing in 5th gear. As far as bulletproof with a good tune, I'm pretty sure an SR can handle more on the stock bottom end than a KA can. An SR is also more efficient as far as hp/liter. Yes, a KA has a little more torque, but imo, the extra weight in the front end isn't worth it. Now if you want to use numbers for your argument, we can discuss the 1300hp SR built by mazworx. It all comes down to personal preference.corbin wrote:KA-T > SR
I think its a shame that people trash their KA's in favor of SR's when KA's are much faster. There is a reason time attack/drag cars all use KA-T, and its because KA has more displacement, more torque, better gear ratios, and is bulletproof with a good tune.
They really run same ratios??? I recently sold my sr powered coupe and now driving stock s14 and first gear seems to be hella short, i dont even feel it there. Is it just me orPyR0NiAk wrote:Fanboys never cease to amaze me... You're arguing displacement with 4 cylinders, and did you really just say better gear ratios? They run the same gear ratio. The only difference is 5th. I don't know about you, but I don't do much racing in 5th gear. As far as bulletproof with a good tune, I'm pretty sure an SR can handle more on the stock bottom end than a KA can. An SR is also more efficient as far as hp/liter. Yes, a KA has a little more torque, but imo, the extra weight in the front end isn't worth it. Now if you want to use numbers for your argument, we can discuss the 1300hp SR built by mazworx. It all comes down to personal preference.corbin wrote:KA-T > SR
I think its a shame that people trash their KA's in favor of SR's when KA's are much faster. There is a reason time attack/drag cars all use KA-T, and its because KA has more displacement, more torque, better gear ratios, and is bulletproof with a good tune.
OutToWinPAHC wrote:Take that 5 grand and upgrade the brakes, diff and suspension first
But how many people actually have the money to build something to the level of Mazworx's SR? Both are good motors but you only pointed out the pros of the SR what about the KA-T Pros. Iron Block, Availability? etc...PyR0NiAk wrote:Fanboys never cease to amaze me... You're arguing displacement with 4 cylinders, and did you really just say better gear ratios? They run the same gear ratio. The only difference is 5th. I don't know about you, but I don't do much racing in 5th gear. As far as bulletproof with a good tune, I'm pretty sure an SR can handle more on the stock bottom end than a KA can. An SR is also more efficient as far as hp/liter. Yes, a KA has a little more torque, but imo, the extra weight in the front end isn't worth it. Now if you want to use numbers for your argument, we can discuss the 1300hp SR built by mazworx. It all comes down to personal preference.corbin wrote:KA-T > SR
I think its a shame that people trash their KA's in favor of SR's when KA's are much faster. There is a reason time attack/drag cars all use KA-T, and its because KA has more displacement, more torque, better gear ratios, and is bulletproof with a good tune.
TouchePyR0NiAk wrote:I had no problem getting my SR... They're pretty readily available. The iron block I did mention when I mentioned the extra weight.I don't consider an iron block a pro. Besides, it was an anti-fanboy argument. I had no reason to discuss the goods of each engine. He was too busy trying to focus on the goods that DON'T exist with a KA, so I filled him in. That's all. I did mention the torque as well. The only other pro I can think of is no rocker arm issues.
Cleaned that up for you.Az24tsx wrote:ERR double post owned lol