Ideal fuel/ air control

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
Tictakman
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 2:42 pm

Post

im on the quest to find the best fuel and air control setup without going to a complete management system. ( i hear that you cant pass emissions)

im looking to get around 400+ hp and from what ive been reading i think a safc II will be ok for the job.

i have a walbro fuel pump and im wanting to get above 550cc injectors. not sure which ones though. can a cobra maf and a safc II control the air/ fuel correctly for a good amount of tuning? or am i way off track?

also any other setups are welcome.

Zak


IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

greddy E-Manage and E-01 EBC/programmer.

also a laptop, a wideband, and an egt sensor for tuning.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

AFAIK, the SAFC and E-Manage can't compensate for the Cobra MAF directly. You'ld have to tune it manually. If you use a MAF that is supported by the SAFC or E-Manage, then the piggyback can calculate the map changes for you. At least I think this is the case with the SAFC. The E-Manage can do this for sure.

If I were looking for some 400+ HP, I'd probably use a JWT ECU and if I needed further tuning, I'd piggy back that as opposed to trying to piggy-back that much based on the stock fuel maps. Piggybacks have to fight the O2 Feedback of the ECU during closed-loop, which can particularly cause problems at high boost part throttle applications. At low to moderate boost levels, you may be able to get away with it, but at higher boost levels, you may run into issues where the piggy-back may not be able to keep the ECU rich enough.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

C-Kwik wrote: At least I think this is the case with the SAFC.


Yes it is

Tictakman
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 2:42 pm

Post

ok ill look into the jwt ecu/ piggyback safc II. what injectors would be more than enough for this application. from what ive read i think i would prefer side fed to cool the fuel going in. any objections?

Zak

andrave
Posts: 3264
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 10:00 am
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX Coupe
Contact:

Post

expensive though...and JWT will only tune to so large on side feeds, I think its 740's...

Tictakman
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 2:42 pm

Post

could i do a cobra maf, 740cc injectors, and e manage?

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

You could, but you'ld be better off with a Z32 MAF. The Cobra MAF is limited to some 350 HP, unless you use a reducer circuit. And the Cobra MAF would have to be tuned completely manually. The Z32 MAF is a supported MAF so the E-Manage can automatically remap any tuning you have done to compensate for it.

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

C-Kwik wrote:The Cobra MAF is limited to some 350 HP, unless you use a reducer circuit.


What do you mean by a reducer circuit?

andrave
Posts: 3264
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 10:00 am
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX Coupe
Contact:

Post

well, first off the cobra maf requires additionally stuff to install, JWT has more details on that. The Z32 mafs is a "supported" mafs so it won't require anything additional. Second, the Z32 mafs is good for at least 550 hp. I've seen some guys push them past that.The cobra mafs is good up to 350-400 hp but if you want more you have to use a reducer circuit, which reduces the voltage it puts out (or something) to extend its usefullness.I think that using a JWT ecu and an emanage is overkill, for the money you might as well get a standalone!

User avatar
huguetpj
Posts: 996
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 7:54 am
Car: 93 KAT Coupe

Post

andrave wrote:The cobra mafs is good up to 350-400 hp but if you want more you have to use a reducer circuit, which reduces the voltage it puts out (or something) to extend its usefullness.


But, I suppose, the Cobra MAF also outputs up to 5V, so reducing the voltage output won't make it read past that. Unless you mess around with the sensor itself, hmmm maybe changing the R values of the R bridge.... but this could be used on the KA MAF also... hmmm need to look into this. :thinker

Tictakman
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 2:42 pm

Post

so from what ive been reading ill be going with the z32 maf. since id be using that then i could go with the safcII correct? or should i go with the emanage with more tuneability?

Zak


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”