sweet man thats awsomeidahotuner wrote:lol.
well i am watching a couple of ebay auctions right now as well for HKS BOV and hot pipe. so if i can get those that will be sweet. save me about 200 dollars too.
so keep your fingers crossed. and dont go out bid me now lol.
and and the deal with the ECU is real not a lie.i emailed scott and he said to run the tuned ecu how it is until i get it dynoed. and then take the a/f chart and dyno chart and mail the ecu in with that for a reflash.
so looking like i might be able to start my car sooner then i thought. we will see
Has this been enough time? There's nothign to argue. The 2871r spools no where near a t25. Never ever ever, unless you'r running like, wacky timing on a 2871r car, and even then it won't.White Comet wrote:true, a lot of what u say is correct, but ur very condescending. i dont feel like arguing anymore about the spool time of the t25 and the gt2871r, maybe later
Tell me about it....This was the #1 piston in the blown block I picked up for a rebuild.DOHC20sr wrote:sounds like youre doing every thing right. just make sure your tune is right. over 20lbs of boost can destroy internals. hence A/F, and timingbelieve me, i learned the hard way. stock pistons have weak ring lands
i dont nderstand then how a ball bearing turbo wont spool as quickly as a stock t25. ball bearing is just aobut the closest to frictionless as u can get. less friction = faster spooling.codyace wrote:
Has this been enough time? There's nothign to argue. The 2871r spools no where near a t25. Never ever ever, unless you'r running like, wacky timing on a 2871r car, and even then it won't.
And condescending is all in the eyes of the beholder. If you don't like un sugar coated advice, I dunno what to tell you.
well in the end, i think it comes down to compressor/turbine combination. the smaller compressor on the t25 will make up for the journal bearings when compared to a bb t28. if you compare the journal bearing GTIR t28 to the s14/s15 bb t28's then you will see a difference in spool time. i also think that the spool time between two identical, journal bearing vs bb, turbos will be a small enough difference that it wouldn't matter. where the ball bearing shines is throttle response.White Comet wrote:i dont nderstand then how a ball bearing turbo wont spool as quickly as a stock t25. ball bearing is just aobut the closest to frictionless as u can get. less friction = faster spooling.
While the above post hits a few points, I'll continue with a few:White Comet wrote:i dont nderstand then how a ball bearing turbo wont spool as quickly as a stock t25. ball bearing is just aobut the closest to frictionless as u can get. less friction = faster spooling.
i have the money. the reason for this is to build credit. so when i graduate from college i can buy a house.i pay it off at the end of every month to get the benefits and none of the disadvantagescodyace wrote:Credit Card build never!
Don't do it man, it will just become addicting! You've come this far, you can wait it off just a bit more and pay for it normally....heck it's still mid winter! Save that credit card for emergencies, and you'll be set!
1. hmm ,thats something i hadnt considered, good point2. reread my post, i never said it was frictionless, i said its CLOSE to frictionless. unless something has been discovered or invented that i miss (doubt it) ball bearing are as close to frictionless as u can get3. yeah i aware of the difference between teh 2, ive driven multiple turbo cars4. never experienced a gt28 but i have a t25codyace wrote:
While the above post hits a few points, I'll continue with a few:
1. The most important (again as above) aspects in determining spool time (in regard to the turbo itself) are wheel design/weight, and housing a/r. This is why a .64 housing 2871r spools much quicker than a .86. Same can be said with T3/t4s when you compare a car with a .48 to a .63 (or larger)....
2. Ball bearings do speed up spool, but it doesn't make it instant by any stretch. With your 'frictionless' example, you could then say that a gt35r would outspool a t25, which is never ever ever ever going to happen. Heck most t25's run out of steam by the time a 35r is even full spool heh. Even with a frictionless (which it isn't) you're still goign to fight some drag, and some resistance.
3. You also fight boost onset, which is commonly IMO confused with lag. Some cars simply feal sluggish in response, even with a fast 'rpm' spool time, and vice versa....some cars just ramp up very slowly into boost...drive a stock wrx and you'll see what I mean. Granted you can tune some of the onset out of a setup, but not to much
4. Have you been in a t25 and or in a gt28 car? You'd certainly see what I mean.
Thanks.2LO4URHO wrote: Cause you're building a beast!
LOL yea we learn something new every day. but this is my build thread so we need to keep it as a that lol.sbird1 wrote:This thread are teach Scott 'bout turbo, durrrr...
No, seriously. I R learning.
hey, just wanted to answer your question. but i'll do it here so we don't clutter up tom's build thread. 235/45 will be fine on the 9" wide rims. it will be slightly stretched but thats how most ppl like it anyway right? but it also depends on the end result setup that you are looking for. i'm not sure if you have coilovers, but if you just want it to look nice and drop the car as low as possible, then the 235 would probably be ideal for you. but if you want your car to be more performance oriented, then i'd suggest going as wide as you can on those 9" rims.idahotuner wrote:
nice info. yes i was a little wrong on my info. i thought the 35% was just a ratio comparing the side wall to side wall to the heigth of the side wall.
you seem to be alot smarter on this. so i got a question. for 17X9 wheel. if i run a 235/45 would that be a good size for 9 inches wide?
/sorry tom for the thread jack/
255's on a 9 shoudl fit with maybe just a roll with the proper wheel offset.tramp_drift240 wrote:255's on a 9" will fit under rolled and pulled fenders?
mental note.
i know stuff about width and offset, just not so much about proper tires.codyace wrote:
255's on a 9 shoudl fit with maybe just a roll with the proper wheel offset.