MinisterofDOOM wrote:Really bad. I want a red turbo coupe. I don't really care which generation--both are gorgeous, for very different reasons.
I want goofy air-cooled rear-engine flat-six weirdness. I want backward-proportions styling and a beautiful roofline. I want a car that probably should never have been made but should never have died either.
If I could have any classic right now, it'd be a turbo Corvair.

You have excellent taste. I owned 2 1965 Monza coupes (non turbo) when I was younger, and I loved them both. The turbos, both 140hp and especially 180hp were known as Porsche beaters. Quick and nimble, like the old 356 and early 911's. , but to keep things in perspective, it was quick/nimble relative to cars of its era. Drive one now and you'll quickly learn most modern cars will blow the doors off it in every category and it lacks most modern amenities we take for granted. It'll also feel cheap as it was a inexpensive car in its day. We're talking sweaty flat vinyl seats, drum brakes, which suck when wet, and 2/55 air conditioning (2 windows down/55 mph), and recirculating ball steering, complete with play. The pre-1965's are the ones that Ralph Nader made himself famous with that turd of a book called Unsafe at Any speed. If you were buying a 'Vair, I'd suggest the 1965 or later, which are sleeker and more importantly, have the independent suspension.
They certainly had their quirks, like you needed to carry a spare fan belt with you as they all wore quickly. you also needed a resealable container of engine oil as they all consumed oil. And you always ran them in the winter with the windows cracked. If the engine seals got old enough, you risked pumping Carbon Monoxide into the interior. Quirks aside, I'd still love to own another one.
