Nice (I have a greddy turbo elbow, so I can use either one)89 240hatch wrote:thats it.the plug is the same
i'm running stock boost getting 25.5mpg almost every time. lately i've been more aggressive on the highway and am seeing about 23.5mpg. please people, state miles per gallon, not miles per tank. i fill up at a quarter tank so as not to run the fuel pump dry too much.I ask good questions wrote:If i am running a internally stock redtop with only a front mount and a three inch exhaust... approximately how many miles should i get from a single tank? Im only getting around 250-260?
i SINCERELY doubt it. check your fuel pressure. if it was running rich enough to cut fuel economy nearly in half, it would hardly run or not at all. i got 12mpg in my built Integra when a sensor went bad and the ECU was in the WOT map 90% of the time. it barely ran most of the time, too. felt like crap, had no power.mallbor240SR wrote:could also be a bad fuel pressure regulator
Uhh, no. I drive pretty aggressively on the street and got 615km on my last TANK. I know this whole "per-tank" concept is difficult on you so I'll do the math for you. 615km = 382.2m The car took 12.5 gallons of fuel to fill the tank. That's an average of almost 31mpg.95lstegman wrote:also fuel economy depends a LOT [yes, that's two words] on driving style. i know some people getting 30-35mpg with their SR20DET's. these people seriously drive like absolute p******. this motor is designed so you don't have to piss off everybody on the road by being a fuel miser. go get a prius, sheesh. then you'll have an excuse for driving slower in a RWD turbo car than my grandmother in a corolla.
**** I wish I got 31mpg..I have a FP big28, 3" turbo back with fat 02 sensor, supra fuel pump, fmic, stock injectors and maf, safc2, and I drive quite modest usually and I only get like 300 miles out of a tank, but if im being an ******* it the needle drops pretty quick.Dori Dori wrote:
Uhh, no. I drive pretty aggressively on the street and got 615km on my last TANK. I know this whole "per-tank" concept is difficult on you so I'll do the math for you. 615km = 382.2m The car took 12.5 gallons of fuel to fill the tank. That's an average of almost 31mpg.
no need to be a smart-***. the reason i say "per-tank" is stupid is because some people fill it when it gets to E, some people realize that there is still more at that point and keep going, some people fill it when the idiot light comes on, etc. and then you have the problem of finding a reasonable gas station. the point is that you'll never fill up the same amount of gas twice. whereas with the miles per gallon approach, you have something solid that is very accurate and can then be compared to previous trips.Dori Dori wrote:Uhh, no. I drive pretty aggressively on the street and got 615km on my last TANK. I know this whole "per-tank" concept is difficult on you so I'll do the math for you. 615km = 382.2m The car took 12.5 gallons of fuel to fill the tank. That's an average of almost 31mpg.
I always have to get on it in 1st b/c of my clutch. I'll wind out 2nd pretty hard too until I reach my desired speed (usually 10 over).95lstegman wrote:how do you drive? maybe your cams make it that much more fun but i have to be making at least a couple psi in order to not feel like i'm driving a honda civic. some people don't mind that feeling but i like to make my body know for sure i'm driving my new toy.
BTW, how are those cams? as compared to stock at the same boost level, that is. i always figured i wouldn't bother putting cams on a stock valvetrain. just doesn't seem right. so if i'm getting an aftermarket valvetrain, why not get even larger cams to actually use the valvetrain's abilities?