smockers83 wrote:It would seem like it to me. Sounds like pfarmer has some electrical engineering experience. Bose is pretty well known for using components rated at 2 ohms in order to get more power out of a low-power system, so I don't think there are any crossovers or differences in how it's wired compared to the non-Bose system.
Impedance is analogous to resistance, it's the same thing.
It really isn't exactly the same although the values are both expressed in ohms.
Impedence of a circuit will change with frequency whereas resistance can be thought of as not changing with frequency. Basically to impedence match or impedence bridge an output of one device (amp for example) to another (speakers for example) the circuit need to take in consideration of the frequencies and the range of variation.
You are pretty close in your thoughts of my experience. Basically I started out in the early sixties working on audio and video equipment and ended my career working in power generation stations. In the case of audio and video equipment you do impedence bridging for the purposes of maximization of the voltage from the source to the load. In the case of power transmission you want to maximize the transfer of power from the source to the load.
However there are similarities to the two. Keep in mind that a typical speaker can be seen as having inductance due to the nature of the windings (coil) and have capacitance due to the relationship of the windings to each other. The same can be said with the speaker cable, however at audio frequencies this is probably very minimal. Now add these same elements from both the amp and the speakers and whatever else is in the circuit (crossovers, etc.) and you need to consider impedence bridging.
In power generation you need to consider types of loads. For example in the morning you have a bunch of electric furnaces coming on line in peoples homes. Now these same people turn on their televisions. Now they all leave and go to work at the local factories with various types of loads inductive or reactive. The generating equipment, transformers, etc. all need to take this into account. Now all are setup with voltage change schedules to handle this daily variation and oil prices go through the roof, and everyone switches from electric heat to natural gas. Your local mills shut down and your inductive loads disappear. Think of the load being capacitive, what does a capacitive circuit see when initially energize, current flow or voltage? Now if inductive, current flow or voltage? Which one leads in each case. We refer to this relationship as VARS IN or VARS out and the typical short term fix is voltage adjustments to change what the load looks like to the generation equipment, often aiming for what is refered to as 'unity'. Big problem for sure, however this usually takes place over a fairly long time period allowing for infrastructure changes to the system.
Not so in high end audio equipment where these changes are basically instantaneous.
Another part of this often overlooked is reflection of the load on the source. A common speaker also does a fine job at being a microphone. That is its movement will generate a signal of its own that reflects back into the circuit driving it.
So to do this correctly you need to have a circuit you introduce that (for simplification) varies in resistance as the source and load varies in resistance and constantly satisfies the needs of both. So back to the first part of this post where the statement was made:
'Impedance is analogous to resistance, it's the same thing. '
You can think of them as being one in the same, however in reality you need to think of them as this since they really are not the same in this situation:
Impedence of a circuit will change with frequency whereas resistance can be thought of as not changing with frequency.
Perry
Modified by pfarmer at 11:43 PM 1/17/2009