Infiniti and Mercedes are aiming at slightly different markets with the M45 and S430 respectively. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages - some of which will appeal to you and some may not. It all depends on what you are looking for!golfgizzard wrote:I am brand new to this forum......I am thinking of purchasing the 2006 M35
I currently own a 2001 Mercedes S430 with only 25,000 miles
Was wondering if any other former or current M-B owners out there could give me a "what differences to expect" list.
Are Infiniti's expensive to work on?Is the ride smooth? (I know they handle very well)
Any advice or opinion will be appreciated.
I think this is a very VERY true statement!!!carbuff wrote:
IMO, Infiniti is ahead of the curve while Mercedes is the curve. Of the two, I prefer the M35.
And this is why most people buy the M35. Consider that with the more expensive 530i, you still only get 255hp. Most people just find the M an overall nice car no matter if it's a 35, or 45. I've put myself in their shoes. If I couldn't afford an M45 would I get the M35, or would I buy something in the same price range with a different brand?scjconsulting wrote:In my case, I came from a 2004 S4 Avant which had a 340HP V8. Very fast (faster than a M45), but it also had all-wheel drive.
I would have been interested in the M45 if it was a M45X.
Some people have a cost consideration, but also, 280HP is enough for a lot of people.
Maybe true, but I have not seen much difference in posts or with friends who have the "x" between the 35x and my 45 on mileage. IF you run both on Premium (recommended for 35, required for 45) you'll probably see 'way less than $200 per year difference on a 12,000mi year. And I believe golfgizzard said his S430 was low mileage, so it'll likely be even more negligible. Both versions of the M are gas-guzzlers.gniknave wrote:
Gas prices certainly aren't helping M45 sales either.
After break-in, if you drive about 60% highway and 40% street, you will see about 16 to 17 to 18 mpg for the M45 and maybe 1 mpg higher for the M35.golfgizzard wrote:My commute is 85 miles RT, 3-4 days per week, but as you can see I have logged 9,000 miles in my first 6 months. The M35's have 18/25 mpg on the sticker.....do you guys find that to be pretty accurate??
Zszhosain wrote:Hi, all.
I was coming back from San Francisco tonight, and traffic was light, so I tried to do a very simplistic mileage test using the built-in MPG measuring system.
(As a side note, I remembered a factoid from my 1991 Q45: once the cruise control is engaged, each click of the Set button reduces the speed setting by 1 mph, and each click of the Reset/Accel button increases the setting by 1 mph. Sure enough, it works the same on my M45 and the speed setting were exact (reading the speedo carefully, of course). Cool! )
Anyway, here is what I did:
* Starting at 60 mph, * I set the cruise control in 5 mph increments from 60 mph to 80 mph, * let the car settle into the speed for about a mile, * reset the MPG counter, * recorded the average MPG after 5 miles. * If the road wasn't reasonably flat in that 5 mile section, I would reset the counter and go for another 5 miles.
Here are the results and they are kinda interesting and confusing at the same time!
* Indicated 60 mph: 29.1 mpg * Indicated 65 mph: 27.0 mpg * Indicated 70 mph: 25.6 mpg * Indicated 75 mph: 23.2 mpg * Indicated 80 mph: 23.2 mpg
What is interesting (peculiar?) is the slightly higher than expected reading at 70 mph (off the slope), and the lack of a real change from 75 to 80 mph!
Note that, at a steady 65mph, the M45 met its CAFE "mileage" of 27mpg for highway driving! Also cool!
Anyone have any explanations for this? Is it some gearing/engine-power/something-else anomaly?
I think I have going to have to repeat this test someday over a wider range of speeds!
Agreed. I tend to be nearer 75 to 80 all the time.jshattner wrote:That could help explain my lousy mileage. Who wants to drive at 60mph in the M45?
Good analysis. I have a similar one for the folks who want to put in 87 or 89 octane into their M45 engines. It just is not worth it, given the relatively minor 10 cent/gallon difference between 91 and 89.jshattner wrote:et's see, a 6mpg difference (let's say 22 vs 28) over 12k/year = 120Gal = $300 or so = $1/day for the fun quotient. Guess I'll forget about 60mph...
The CLS55 AMG is definitely awesome, and, yeah, I would not mind owning one. But, the price difference between these two cars would lead me to get the M45 Sport instead for sure!Nick240sx wrote:my dad owns a CLS55 AMG, and the cars hauls. personally i love the looks of the M45 SPORT.