Hey I'm a teenager, but then again I've had my license for a while, I don't really talk too much trash, and I'd say I know more about automobiles than the average person my age, so I guess this dosn't really apply to me.burnout 180 wrote:Its those darn teenagers who are just getting their licenses who are talking trash.
Well, it also depends on your style, you can't rely on the torque a KA has when you drift a CA, because it's just not there. Though this is purely hypothetical; My old CA never ran long enough for me to slide itmbmbmb23 wrote:That Mikespeed95 is a moron. And I quote:
"ive read several accounts of CA owners on drifting boards post CA swap saying " i should have left in the stock ka, it peformed better than CA modded for drifting" , while it may go a tad faster stock for stock it has no torque, which is why i think it is totally..."
What an idiot. How many of those fools on his drifing boards had their CA correctly geared (4.3 VLSD) before making their "stock for stock" driftah comparisons and saying the CA sucked? Morons.
Someone who's registered please point that out in their thread.
-m
Hey man, I hope you don't mind, but I gotta snatch this quote for my sig.themadscientist wrote:Don't waste your time arguing with a moron, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Wish I could claim it but I am quoting a good freind of mine, The Boost Warrior. He shares our disdain for moronsSil40_Mayhem wrote:Hey man, I hope you don't mind, but I gotta snatch this quote for my sig.
slideways wrote:yeahp. it gets worse on Zilvia.net
time after time they keep ranting about how much more superior sr is over ca, how it was a much better production engine. I just dont see why it is always under debale. thats like comparing b16 to b18 because ive seen d16 vtech turbo womp on nsx's. Lisa kubo was runing low 9's on SOHC d16 NA set up.
ca/sr ca>sr ca<sr blah blah blah. every single motor ever producted has the POSSIBILITY of being powerful and superior over LESS modified engines. a special ed kid can tell you this. ant> scorpion " probly wont make since to most" but if there are more of them then the point is made a lot easier. like said from that debate, sr is known becasue its featured in power pages and HOW TO's from magazine to magazine. if ca was given the chance to shine then people would repect it as well. but it wil lalways remain the LOWER DOGG engine that just gets stepped on all over forusm worldwide/
anyhow im done with the debate, u can see my replys on varioius threads from different forums. my mouth is silent. we are blessed with the information which keeps our engines under the :" greater few" and until every ca is gone i will remain to run mine.
"The French" bought a controlling share of Nissan in March of 1999.The Renault buyout had nothing to do with the SR replacing the CA. In fact, it had nothing to do with either engine in any way.Kouks wrote:By the way, I thought the only reason the CA was removed from the s chassis was that the french bought nissan and the sr was more COST effective to produce.