Post by
davidricardo86 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/davidricardo86-u32537.html
Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:39 pm
First of all, I dislike peoples opinions on Honda and any other manufacturers besides the car they drive. For example, some one was saying something about VTEC and Honda technology.
First of all HONDA IS THE SH*T! Accept it! I own a 1992 Nissan 240SX SE and i can actually say that because i know damn well that these dudes in Japan got their sh*t down. Nissan is a great company but if you asked me or someone who knows what theyre talking about, they might tell you the same. If you actually know sh*t about engine technology or automobile technology in general, you would know that Toyota and Honda are some of the great pioneers in engine technology. Back in the late 1980's, Toyota cam out with the first affordable, high reving, lightweight, Dual Over Head Cam engine for the mass market, known as the 4AGE (for its day atleast). Oh wow, a ka24de. Boring outdated classic rocker arm technology. Its great for the average person, but not that great for my standards. How variable valve timing and cam phasing work is a wonderful concept! Nissan didnt get on the techno savy bandwagon till a few years later. While Mitsubishi sort of started this, Honda, then Toyota then later Nissan and other manufacturers all came along with their versions of varying cam timing, etc. A ca18det is crap compared to some of the latest and greatest from Honda Motor Co. I know a lot of you do not like hearing this but its true. Accept the fact. Then respond with a civil and intellectual comment. Even back when Honda's VTEC system came out in the NSX, its was roocking the hell out of our CA18DET, SR20DET, etc. Even an RB engine wasnt all that great when it frist debuted. Except for power and boost. Our engines DO NOT have better breathing than a Honda NA engine. Our precious SRs, and Rbs, or even our "free reving" CAs dont compare. Maybe the new RBs, SRs, and some of the latest engine from Nissan. Dont think so? Well buddy youre wrong. The way that the cam lobes are setup for high end and low end is great! Think of it almost like SOHC vs DOHC. One camshaft controlling intake and the other camshaft controlling exhaust. Thats great! Two things are better than one, for this example. Yeeah yeah yeah... i know some might say something about the reving abilities of both but thats not my point. But now add variable valve timing with lift control (Toyota's VVTL-i ) and youre on a whole new level.
This time we'll say mine just for this example, a DOHC CA 1.8L does not breath better than a B18 VTEC engine from Honda! Its an NA motor meant to achieve great flow in high and low rpms with its infamous VTEC system. My engine doesnt have that option. Either i can make power in the low end, or the high end. Thats it! Nothing else. You could try and find a happy medium but its nothing compared to being able to have control over both. Yeah the torque is "low" but Honda did not produce these cars to be "V8 torque monsters!!!!" Look at Honda and what they actually try to do. TRACK! Integra, Civic, S2000, NSX, etc. Not 1/4 mile or drag racing. Overall balance, qaulity and a whole lot of engineering. Drag racing is great, just not for Honda. I myself prefer track. CA vs B18. Sorry CA not this time. Nissan didnt need variable valve timing because they put turbochargers and produce great numbers, etc. Just different companies taking different routes. I think GM, Ford, and others are barely catching up to this technology.
Please for the love of god dont post some retarded sh*t about "Honda VTIK this and that, F'ing Honda, Honda engines have liek 98 ft lb of torque... etc." because obviously my friend, you are a moron. Learn, study, then discuss. Dont bash on other manufacturers for their technologcal feats. Just because our engines dont have ceratin things, doesnt mean theyre not great, it just means theyre not AS great.
Sorry for the long post but i had to get this off my chest. This was because of another topic thats going on now, so i thought id make my own.