Post by
Offshore1 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/offshore1-u100864.html
Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:31 am
When I bought the Versa, I didn't test drive anything else. Well , that started to bother me; did I make a good decision? I have heard SO much good stuff about the Fit; I started to think I bought the wrong car, and should have bought a Fit.
Yesterday while bored @ work, I was on the Carmax site. They had a 2008 Fit sport, Red - 5spd. EXACTLY what I would have bought IF I were to buy a Fit. To top it off, it only had 2800 miles on it. (My V has 3000). I was interested cause if I liked it, it was going home with me since it was basically new.
After looking it over and test driving it here are my thoughts:The Fit is much smaller/narrower. The door was much closer to my left arm than the V and when shifting, my arm would touch the salesman's arm every shift. Made me feel like I was sandwiched in. There was no center arm rest either. The back seat was ok, but not as roomy as the V by a long shot - but it was ok / do-able. The Fit's rear cargo opening would be easier to load stuff and the cargo area seemed bigger, but the carpet / plastic in the cargo area seemed really low rent; the there were some nice cubbys back there. The Fit's front seats feel more comfortable to me, but the foot well area was (to me) tight. Felt like my feet were forced into a narrow area. Everytime I pushed in the clutch, the left side of my shoe would contact the left wheel well. Plus the clutch throw was real odd (short). The V has much more foot well room. The front seats on the Fit were on some kind of riser - the floor pan was formed so the seats were higher up, which reduced foot well room alot!The in town ride was firmer (jiggly) but hwy was fine. Acceleration in 5th (hwy) seemed to be better than the V. It was cool out, so I couldn't tell if the AC was good or not. Entry and exit is ok, but the rear entry exit is slightly more difficult. The Fit did seem to handle better - more confident cornering.
The V is built cheap, but the Fit seems to be even cheaper (is that possible).
The Fit's audio system sounded better and had a few more features, BUT no steering wheel controls or Blue tooth (could care less about BT). Plus it appears impossible to put a better radio in (which isn't important to me).
I do like the looks MUCH better on the Fit. I was trying to like it! I went there to buy the car. But after looking at the Fit and driving it; the V feels more like an upscale car (to me) in direct comparison. The V rides better, is SO much more roomy I don't understand why the V gets overlooked and the Fit gets all the hype. Am I missing something here? I understand there is an azz for every seat and a seat for every azz. . . . . . . but I was very disappointed; I had read SO much good stuff. . . . . . . . .
I guess the V is better than I thought. Oh - BTW: Since my V got around 800ish miles, I have been CONSISTENTLY getting 32.* to 33.* MPG. Never had a tank under 32 MPG (hand & Scanguage calculated)
Sorry for the long post.