Doubtful, the added weight and price would negate any real gains.DrivingHabit wrote:Ford is making a focus hyrid or has it been out???
Nice to see a Versa hybrid if it ever happens!
Well, considering that a hybrid Altima is available (in CA, CT, MA, ME, NJ, NY, OR, RI, and VT), I wouldn't say that they are entirely 'not into' hybrids. Of course, all they did was license Toyota's Synergy Drive so they wouldn't have to recreate the wheel.feloniousmonk wrote:No. Nissan is not into hybrids. Expect all electric offerings.
Haven't they said they wanted a full electric vehicle by 2010/2011?Rockhound wrote:
Well, considering that a hybrid Altima is available (in CA, CT, MA, ME, NJ, NY, OR, RI, and VT), I wouldn't say that they are entirely 'not into' hybrids. Of course, all they did was license Toyota's Synergy Drive so they wouldn't have to recreate the wheel.
Also, there are reports surfacing that Infiniti is planning on bringing out a hybrid version of the M, possibly in 2010. It would contain proprietary-Nissan hybrid technology, unlike the Altima. Silly move if you ask me, but I guess they think that someone needs to challenge the LS600h for the large luxury sedan hybrid segment, for which shoppers are lined up none-deep.
Who knows what will actually come to market, though. Ghosn mentioned in 2005 that he was not a fan of hybird technology, a year prior to the Altima hybrid release, although he did address that it was mainly a way to meet stringent California guidelines.
Autoblog Infiniti hybrid report: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/0...2010/
If the Insight can even compete with the Prius. It all depends. The Insight is cheaper but not as fuel efficient as the Prius. The new one gets 50 mpg.Mile High Versa wrote:Nissan will come up with their own Hybrid to compete against the Toyota Prius and Honda Insight. Who knows what the name will be. It makes sense because their needs to be a bigger market for the technology. Not everyone wants to drive an SUV. Especially if you don't have a large family or you're just driving yourself to work or run a few errands.
Personally, I prefer an all electric plug in, no need to worry about lithium batteries aging over time of excessive use. When you're done driving for the day, all you gotta do is park the car in the garage, plug it in for overnight and it will be fully charged the next morning. I'm not sure how the electricity is stored, and what type of battery is uses.
Gas prices will go up before summer guaranteed. It's a trend that occurs every year, oil companies know people tend to drive more and longer during the summer season. Remember the gas prices were above 4 dollars a gallon last June/July? They will want to rake in as much money as possible from the consumer.
You need to educate yourself on the oil and gas industry, as well as the concept of commodity prices. Oil and natural gas are traded as futures, oil companies have absolutely no say in setting the price of these commodities. If they did, why do you think oil is fluctuating at only around $50/bbl and natural gas at under $4/MMCF? Why would the evil Big Oil companies keep natural gas prices low during winter months, when the lion's share of Americans heat their homes with methane?Mile High Versa wrote:Gas prices will go up before summer guaranteed. It's a trend that occurs every year, oil companies know people tend to drive more and longer during the summer season. Remember the gas prices were above 4 dollars a gallon last June/July? They will want to rake in as much money as possible from the consumer.
Wow. I hope you're kidding.Slither wrote:I heard oil isn't fossil i.e. from dino's but a naturally occurring process from beneath Earth's crust. When a field is pumped out it replenishes by this process. But big oil prefers we think limited fossil-based supply.
I often wonder where and how people come up with such gibberish. I am a petroleum engineer and have been working in the industry for 30 years and this is the first time I have ever heard this wild one. I would certainly love to work on one of these self replenishing fields instead of the >500 million dollar polymer injection project we are considering due to declining production. The field has a high viscosity oil that cannot be waterflooded very efficiently, so we are looking at ways to recover another 7 % of the oil in place within the reservoir rock. Oil is not within nice big caverns, but located within the pore spaces of rock.Slither wrote:Hybrids have no heat in winter driving - wonder about electrics.
I heard oil isn't fossil i.e. from dino's but a naturally occurring process from beneath Earth's crust. When a field is pumped out it replenishes by this process. But big oil prefers we think limited fossil-based supply.
I just cannot see the love affair with hybrids. Why pay such a premium for the hybrid when good fuel efficient cars are available at a much lower price?DrivingHabit wrote:Ford is making a focus hyrid or has it been out???
Nice to see a Versa hybrid if it ever happens!
That's awesome that you're a petroleum engineer. I started out pursuing a BS in engineering, but geology caught my attention and I found that I had a passion for it. I've been in the industry for 5 years - 1.5 of which as a full-fledged geologist - so I've got an immense amount to learn. But I hope that's always the case.fjwagner wrote:I often wonder where and how people come up with such gibberish. I am a petroleum engineer and have been working in the industry for 30 years and this is the first time I have ever heard this wild one. I would certainly love to work on one of these self replenishing fields instead of the >500 million dollar polymer injection project we are considering due to declining production. The field has a high viscosity oil that cannot be waterflooded very efficiently, so we are looking at ways to recover another 7 % of the oil in place within the reservoir rock. Oil is not within nice big caverns, but located within the pore spaces of rock.
I guess we do not need to spend that money, just wait for the oil to replenish Please swing by next time you are in Houston and we can put you on the payroll!!! Either that, or educate you.
What Rockhound says is absolutely right. Fred
The Altima hybrid is an exception. It was a stop-gap measure to prevent market share loss. As you pointed out yourself, it rides on borrowed technology from Toyota. My comment was regarding Nissan, efforts that 100% its own and I wasn't talking about Infiniti. I work on marketing for both brands. Expect to see a all-electric car from Nissan. Information is readily available in past Autoblog entries.Rockhound wrote:
Well, considering that a hybrid Altima is available (in CA, CT, MA, ME, NJ, NY, OR, RI, and VT), I wouldn't say that they are entirely 'not into' hybrids. Of course, all they did was license Toyota's Synergy Drive so they wouldn't have to recreate the wheel.
Also, there are reports surfacing that Infiniti is planning on bringing out a hybrid version of the M, possibly in 2010. It would contain proprietary-Nissan hybrid technology, unlike the Altima. Silly move if you ask me, but I guess they think that someone needs to challenge the LS600h for the large luxury sedan hybrid segment, for which shoppers are lined up none-deep.
Who knows what will actually come to market, though. Ghosn mentioned in 2005 that he was not a fan of hybird technology, a year prior to the Altima hybrid release, although he did address that it was mainly a way to meet stringent California guidelines.
Autoblog Infiniti hybrid report: http://www.autoblog.com/2009/0...2010/
Hybrids are for those who'd like to think and outwardly show to others that they are doing something good for the environment without actually doing anything of significance. Ask them about issues regarding batteries and disposal of it. I doubt you'll hear any intelligent responses. Environmental impact of producing a Prius is about as high, if not higher, than that of a H2 Hummer.fjwagner wrote:
I just cannot see the love affair with hybrids. Why pay such a premium for the hybrid when good fuel efficient cars are available at a much lower price?
so, your reply to technical challenge by both Rockhound and myself is a one word response using a biological term. Made me a believer . Your original post says that you "heard" this. Great. I have heard alot of things that are not true. So, you said that this replenishment comes from beneath the earth's crust. So, how deep? How does this source migrate through the various geologic layers. Some are impermeable as a matter of fact which would make this migration rather difficult. If you are going to present different theories, please enlighten us with some supportable evidence beyond "I heard". Thanks in advance for your upcoming response.Slither wrote:Abiotic.
Well, my thesis focused on the Woodford, but the outfit I work for does not operate any Woodford wells. The tight gas sands I work are of the Cotton Valley/Hosston (Travis Peak, if you go by East Texas nomenclature) variety.fjwagner wrote:Rockhound - Woodford shale gas? With 5 - 8 percent porosity, I would expect some natural fracturing also.
Well, for me it's definitely a pet peeve to have people who are clearly clueless about the oil and gas industry throw out 'theories' that they've 'heard' and believe them as proven fact.Slither wrote:Did I hit a raw nerve?
Abiotic oil - do a Thesis on it.
We could turn him into oil. It'd take a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time but it'd be worth it.Rockhound wrote:
Well, for me it's definitely a pet peeve to have people who are clearly clueless about the oil and gas industry throw out 'theories' that they've 'heard' and believe them as proven fact.
Like the 'fact' that oil companies set the price of commodities.
Or the 'fact' that oil has no biotic source.
Both are clearly out of touch with reality if you actually know what you're talking about, which I do.
the only nerve you hit is your outward display of ignorance and your unwillingness to explain your own theory like others do with theirs. You suggest that we do our own research on your unsubstantiated theory. No thanks. Lay out your facts so we can then comment. Unless you dont have any which would be my assumption. Your science teacher will be proud of you. Stopping your report after you write down your hypothesis. FredSlither wrote:Did I hit a raw nerve?
Abiotic oil - do a Thesis on it.
You need to slow down and read these posts a little more carefully. I don't work for "Big Oil" - I work for an American independent exploration and production (that's what E&P means) company. We don't own our own rigs, we don't transport our hydrocarbons, and we don't do any refining or other downstream operations.Slither wrote:This is a car blog not an infomercial for big oil - take the agenda elsewhere.
you know what Slither, you started it with your abiotic comment and you do not have the knowledge to defend your comment. As such, you get angry and want to shut down a discussion that you initiated. In the future, please do not toss out uninformed comments and then run when you are challenged. If you post something, then be prepared to discuss or do not post it at all. This has not been a big informercial for big oil, but an effort to set fundamental facts straight that are completely unrelated to the size of an oil company. Come spend a day in our office and I will be very happy to help you understand. You may contact me on the website anytime.Slither wrote:This is a car blog not an infomercial for big oil - take the agenda elsewhere.
If by blog you mean internet forum......Slither wrote:This is a car blog not an infomercial for big oil - take the agenda elsewhere.
Right, it'd be a lot more informative if it was one... instead we get rampant slandering by those who don't understand the very points they defend. Entertaining nonetheless.Red Devil wrote:
If by blog you mean internet forum......