Q45Tech, doesn't the nature of the velocity stack base of a JWT POP not, by design, straighten the air's entry, increase velocity & create a cooling effect by moving from a smaller diameter opening to a larger one?
Jeff Williams wrote:
The K&N Pop Charger is definitely no "Cold Air Intake" system, more like a Hot Air Intake system.
I've heard this before & I'm aware of the temperature differential under hood vs outside ambient, but when moving, IMHO, I find it hard to beleive there's that much of a difference.
Jeff Williams wrote:The factory plastic intake was no thermal barrier, either. Once the engine bay heats up, the plastic transfers heat to the intake air. The only saving grace part of that, is, usually the car is in motion, and the air going into the intake is much warmer than the air in the engine bay.
Did you not mean "air in the intake is *cooler* than the bay?"
Jeff Williams wrote:I wonder if modifying the resistance to the plenum temperature sensor, would help boost power, similar to the OBDII system modifications on eBay, that modify the intake air sensor, to make it think the air is hotter, and increasing the fuel mixture.
On Honda/Acura apps, Jackson Racing uses an additional MAP sensor in their s/c attached to a relay that switches to a 10k ohm resistor installed inline on the IAT to trick the ecu into thinking the air is *cooler* outside, in an attempt to richen the mixture when under boost. Unfortunately, it doesn't work the way they designed it, so even though it's still in their kits, it's defeated within the relay, extra work, more wiring, useless. But that's honda/acura, and speed density, not Nissan & mass air.
If the extrapolation between OBD I coolant temp sensor & HVAC reference lets the ecu "guess" what the ambient temp is, would it not also richen the mixture if the ambient temp was cold, or would it excusively rely on the voltage in the MAF?
Thanks for the response, guys, this is interesting.