nlzmo400r wrote:well i did that and i think my car gets like .o567 hp per pound, i thiought that was kinda off, seemed a lil low to me, i was figuring more like 2hp per pound, but then agian, 2hp multiplied by the weight of my car would give me 6k hp!!
nlzmo400r wrote:hey appreciate it, now i dont know what the s*** im doin!!, o well, ill just settle for lb per hp, thanx for tryin tho guys, hey, i didnt notice this 'quick reply box' was named after fred, hmmm, congrats fred
nlzmo400r wrote:it was just funny that i NEVER noticed that before, i assume that palmerwmd fred right?, did he start this site or something??
yashin wrote:i'm not sure if i know exactly how to do this but if i remember my high school physics correctly ( which i don't) i beleive you use the cosine but that's my answer to pretty much any math or physics problem, everythign always comes back to the cosine
yea, thats about what i figuredEZcheese15 wrote:Um yeah....the cosine doesn't really apply here.
Unless ofcourse you have offset vector forces applying different forces. Then you have to calculate the vector compenent forces using cosine and sine. But actually, you'd probably be using tangent also, and maybe ever the secant, cosecant, and cotangent, but only if you know your law of sines, and law of cosines.