themadscientist wrote:I have never encountered a failed ring land on a CA piston, nor an SR. I have seen an RB26 fail there but he was beating that motor to hell. I think that the reason the rod knock develops is the bolts are too small and stretch causing the bearing in the big end to fail. That is just my theory based on looking at the parts and the way they fail. I bet if the CA had bolts the size of the SR it would not fail like it does.
I hear so many people blaming the engine for failure when in most cases if you really look at the situation it was operator error that caused it. Even the strongest of uber-expensive parts will fail if you beat on them with too much timing, lean mixtures etc. The rod failure for the CA would at least to me seem to be a weakness vulnerable to revs. I would not worry too much if you don't routinely hang out in the red zone of your tach. I kept my DE way up there all the time and after months of 8500 RPM launches and constant steep rev climbs with the light flywheel when I tore it down I could just barely detect bearing wear on #1.
With My 180 I am not pulling the motor until it tells me to. It has 160000 Km on it and purrs like a kitten. That is close to 10 years with an S14 turbine, countless high speed battle and stoplight confrontations with no signs of blowby, rod knock piston failure. I don't have a magic engine but to listen to the rumors such a thing is an impossibility.
Could it be the fact that this motor has been in my care all that time? Religious oil changes with synthetic oil, timing belt changes every 50000 Km, tune ups, coolant flushes etc? It's a machine, it will work if you care for it, abuse it and it goes POP!
Most of the engines you guys are getting have been beat to hell, overreved by drifters and never taken care of from the time the factory service agreement expired with the first owner. I am suprised your motors run at all, 99% of them should be rebuilt the minute they are dropped off at your house. To look at a motor in that state and say the design is flawed because it lets go as the new owner tries to figure out what he is doing isn't fair.
The only thing about the CA that gives me pause is the rod bolts and it's a brief pause. It is not the uh-oh I feel when I look at an SR's valvetrain, or an FJ's upper timing chain tensioner and nowhere near the foreboding of an early RB26 crank's oil pump drive. If you have the money get aftermarket rods and pistons but if you are on a budget and don't want much more than 300hp the factory rods, checked for flaws with new bolts and a set of new cast pistons will do just fine. Polish the crowns if you want, it helps and only costs you time and fatigue on your jerk-off arm. The money you save can go towards something truly contributory to engine performance and longevity, a real engine management system.
This is the bible and will soon enter this forum's archives, so folks need to use the search button. All the thoughts I could think of are here and need not be REPEATED again and AGAIN and again. I will add this: tell-tell signs of stretched rod bolts is when you see your rod bearing shells both pressed on to the crank's journal, when the bearings are not fully seated in the rod's bearing cradle and when you have just plain-'ol spun a rod bearing. If your bearings are all locked in place when you remove them, your rod bolts have not been stretched to the point of needing servicing and a fresh set of bearings will be all you need.
As for the pistons, I've pushed them waaaay past 400whp and they hold up just fine. Like TMS said, if you're running too much timing or running the engine lean, even the wisecos or the CPs will crack their ringlands and I have personally destoyed some wiseco pistons when I was using the JWT stuff back in 1999-2000. This subject is done and Mike, unless you have any objections, I'm locking this thread.
Dee