I looked up that intake.http://www.xcessivemanufacturi...tep=4
Xessive does not list intake runner length or cross sectional area. They don't even list what rpm range the intake will work most efficiently at. Flow tests are one thing. But they don't take into account the Helmholz resonator affect.
http://www.grapeaperacing.com/...s.pdf
If the manifold is capable of this effect you would see significant jump in torque when the engine entered the RPM range in which it was effective.
Also it would be listed on the manufactures page.Most manifolds will have a listing such as this."The runner design is ''tuned'' for peak torque around 3500 rpm on a 350-inch engine and it's ideal for power from off-idle to 5500 rpm. Dyno tests showed gains averaging 5+ ft/lbs. of torque from 3000 to 4500 rpm for more performance where your need it most." Edelbrock Performer EPS Vortec Manifold
Stroking is also going to limit your Redline. If the Xessive intake is a tuned runner design it is probably some where in the 8k to 9k RPM range. This range is most likely unreachable with the 2.6 crank.
If you look at stock dyno runs for the ka24de you will see a jump between 3500 and 4200. Thats the intake doing its thing. There the engine goes from 85% efficiency to above 90%. Most of the higher output L's hit that around 6 and the really highly strung engines will hit it in the 7 to 8 range.
You want to pick cams, springs, crank and intake that can all hit top efficacy in over lapping ranges.
Also Ajax,Who did your last dyno tuning? They made that torque curve nice and flat. Thats a great for driveablity and speed but tends to make it feel a little slower. Some people call it refined. Its only slower until you look at the speedo, then you think that didn't feel like 100mph. Its all about the area under the torque curve.
-Avery