oh, my bad for puttin out the bad info Carl. Yeah, I looked it up, it says 1500 - 4200 for the RB25 (assuming the internet source is correct).Carl H wrote:nah if anything the 25 has the same cams as the 20.fwiw vtc is only engaged between 1050-4800, so yeah.
also why he destroyed the motor..Shocker wrote:bobnissan was taking his to almost 9 grand with a stock head. Now I dont recommend this if you want it to last with standard hydrolifters.. he was also running a pt67...
Ok, the full story on the ecu is that I acquired it with my half cut so it is a JDM tune. I have a chip reader and burner that I was able to take the chip and read it to compare it to an OEM tune. What I found were:
Fuel map: Minor changes, mainly to help spool
Ign map: slightly more aggressive to help spool
no speed cut and rev limiter raised to 8300 (i would not recommend revving above 8k personally unless rod bolts are upgraded)
It is still tuned for the stock injectors and maf which are the main points of a tune.
My personal experiences with the tune were with the stock turbo at first, but then i switched to a RB25 NEO turbo (which is slightly larger than a normal RB25 turbo)
I compared the tune w/ a stock tune and noticed these traits:
on WOT tip in (from cruising speed to WOT) the car picked up very aggressively vs OEM.
Also the car pulled harder throughout the rev range and most noticeably up top.
With this setup I was side by side w/ a WS6 trans am that traps ~108mph in the quarter.
240z4u wrote:Chad, are you talking about Jons 280z?
Man this thread is OLD.