How many RPM can you safely spin on a stock internal RB25DET

Discuss the RB20, RB25 and RB26 series engines.
240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Hey guys, I have not had a stock ecu in my car forever. I set the rev limit to 6800 and I am thinking that might be too low. Car still pulling really hard when it hits rev limit.

Where is the stock setting? and at what point do the valves start to float with stock springs etc??

Thanks guys, I did search but could not find the answer to this question.

Evan


User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

stock is 6800.as far as revlimit i was revving my 20 to 8.5 on stock springs with no float...your mileage may vary.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Alrighty. 8500?? damn i dont know that i have the balls!!

Thanks carl

Joe
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post

you wont make power much above the rev limiter unless you have a bigger turbo, cams, etc.


240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Yeah I know. I have a big turbo, just no cams.

I was just wondering if I could bump it up some because car is still pulling really hard when it hits the rev limiter. I was not sure what the valve train could handle.

That power should be dropping off in the low mid 7ks I would guess.

Evan

User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

strange that it keeps pulling till redline, on the 20 the cams are a huge hinderance in making power.goofynick's dyno showed it it would pull hard till about 6,3-6,5k and then it would take a nosedive.add cams and springs before changing the revlimiter.

Joe
Posts: 6511
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 8:29 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post

its because its a rb25 ya noob.

bigger cams i believe i read somewhere.

User avatar
rustbucket
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:05 am
Car: '90 s13 RB25DET SII

Post

My best 1/4 mile times came from shifting at 7200 on the stock rb25, seems to put it in a sweet spot with the nvcs and boost in the next gear. But I guess it also has to do with tire size and rearend gearing as well.

Justin Duncklee
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:30 am

Post

Mine is set at 8100rpm when I'm at 19psi.

Muaha ha ha ha. No valve float or anything.

User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

nah if anything the 25 has the same cams as the 20.fwiw vtc is only engaged between 1050-4800, so yeah.

User avatar
matafied
Posts: 423
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:15 am
Car: 1989 240 rb25det 1992 240 rb25det

Post

sweeeeeeeeeet!! cant wait to push mine to 8K

User avatar
rustbucket
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 3:05 am
Car: '90 s13 RB25DET SII

Post

Carl H wrote:nah if anything the 25 has the same cams as the 20.fwiw vtc is only engaged between 1050-4800, so yeah.
oh, my bad for puttin out the bad info Carl. Yeah, I looked it up, it says 1500 - 4200 for the RB25 (assuming the internet source is correct).
Modified by rustbucket at 1:56 PM 6/7/2007

User avatar
lucky7
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 4:31 pm
Car: 97 RB25 S14

Post

ive only had mine a couple days now. i just shift at 7k if im getting on it.

User avatar
Shocker
Posts: 2082
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:40 pm
Car: 89 240sxHB rb26/30

Post

bobnissan was taking his to almost 9 grand with a stock head. Now I dont recommend this if you want it to last with standard hydrolifters.. he was also running a pt67...

Don't take it much higher than you make power, after that its decently pointless unless your going to fall out of your powerband after you shift.

Stock turbo rb25's run outta breathe after 63-6400 rpms soo no need to rev past the stock 6900.

User avatar
eh?
Posts: 1781
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 2:26 pm

Post

Shocker wrote:bobnissan was taking his to almost 9 grand with a stock head. Now I dont recommend this if you want it to last with standard hydrolifters.. he was also running a pt67...
also why he destroyed the motor..

Unless you have modified the oiling system keep your RPM below 7500. I wouldn't worry about valve float.

User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

oil pump assplosion!

User avatar
midnightsliding
Posts: 915
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:48 pm

Post

i dont have a rev limiter, my safc has recorded 8100rpm more then once.

User avatar
StricNyne
Posts: 3725
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 1:11 pm

Post

aussies say with hydro lifters dont go over 8400, i am gunna be bringing my motor to prolly 8100 ish but i upgraded valve springs just need to drop in cams, also u only need to rev as high as you make power no need to rev to 9k when yer stocker turbo stops pumping out air at damn near 6800, but basically the rb25 rev limit is hindered by the hydro lifters and looking at the work i would need to run those i opted to look into turbo applications that dont require me to rev ultra high and use solid lifters

User avatar
Carl H
Posts: 5985
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:09 am
Car: 1995 Nissan 240SX SE RB30DET

Post

remember all those threads we had about changing out the oil pump and collaring the crank, yah thats another limiter to how high you can turn the motor.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

I did the stage eleventeen package. I set my limiter to 12,000 but usually only take it up to 10k. lol.

I did fix the oil pump collar issue while I had my motor apart.

Great replies guys. Thank alot.

Evan

StockAsFuhS14
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 6:05 pm
Car: Bone stock S14

Post

i wish this thread had some mechanical specs..i cant seem to find any

Darius
Posts: 4820
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 9:48 am
Car: RB25DET S14 - 665 WHP (SOLD)
Location: Chicagoland

Post

What kind of mechanical specs are you looking for??

chad b.
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:17 am
Car: chocolate chip kouki
Location: Mobile, AL

Post

A buddy of mine made 650whp on a stock RB for years spinning it to 7500 MAX. He moved the limiter to 8000 and it lasted 2 weeks. The rod bolts stretched and sent the rod through the block. That being said, on stock rod bolts, I'd set the limiter somewhere between 7200 and 7500. With the stock head and cams, you're not gonna see any real benefits to spinning it another 500-600 rpm anyway. The last thing you want is a hole through the block.

RRRRB
Posts: 759
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:31 am
Car: 98 RB powered S14
Location: WA

Post

i revved mine on a stock rb25 head and cams to 7800 for over a year like that.. never had an issue...

with a GT30R it held power out that far as well

klh6686
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 8:34 am
Car: '92 FB stock daily
'90 FB w/ RB20
'92 FB w/ VH45

Post

Ha funny to see this thread back from the dead. I can confirm what CarlH said, I ran a rb20 to 8.5 stock longblock w/o issues for probably 3 years straight, and she was bouncing off the rev limiter most of that time.

240z4u
Posts: 2071
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:47 am
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

Chad, are you talking about Jons 280z?

Man this thread is OLD.

User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

Now that thread is kinda back. I picked up an ECU for my upcoming RB20 S13 project. Nico members are awesome. He sent me info that I am posting here more for me than you all, but from the sound of it I should be perfect on this tune with a pretty stock set-up.

Ok, the full story on the ecu is that I acquired it with my half cut so it is a JDM tune. I have a chip reader and burner that I was able to take the chip and read it to compare it to an OEM tune. What I found were:

Fuel map: Minor changes, mainly to help spool
Ign map: slightly more aggressive to help spool
no speed cut and rev limiter raised to 8300 (i would not recommend revving above 8k personally unless rod bolts are upgraded)

It is still tuned for the stock injectors and maf which are the main points of a tune.

My personal experiences with the tune were with the stock turbo at first, but then i switched to a RB25 NEO turbo (which is slightly larger than a normal RB25 turbo)

I compared the tune w/ a stock tune and noticed these traits:
on WOT tip in (from cruising speed to WOT) the car picked up very aggressively vs OEM.
Also the car pulled harder throughout the rev range and most noticeably up top.

With this setup I was side by side w/ a WS6 trans am that traps ~108mph in the quarter.

chad b.
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:17 am
Car: chocolate chip kouki
Location: Mobile, AL

Post

240z4u wrote:Chad, are you talking about Jons 280z?

Man this thread is OLD.

yep. He told me that's what he felt was the culprit.


Return to “RB20DET / RB25DET / RB26DETT Forum”