How does this setup sound

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
574-240sx
Posts: 9432
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 6:27 pm
Car: Nissans, Toyotas, Subaru

Post

Ok I have almost all the parts except the manifold. I would like to run a bottom mount manifold.

370cc injectorsT3/T04E 50 trim w/ .63 a/r on the hotside (internal wastegate too)SAFCIIHKS sequential BOVmanual boost controllerCometic 3 mil headgasket(will be installed when I blow my first headgasket)300ZX TT fuel pump300zx TT fuel filter

I'm bidding on an intercooler and boost gauge. Should I run a MSD timing retarder? If so which one do i need. I plan on running 7psi right now. I think thats all the injectors can handle. I think thats all. Nick


User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Unless you tune the motor to detonate, there is little chance you will blow the headgasket. The Cometic Headgasket will do little more than take up space on your desk or something. Either install it initially, or tune the motor not to detonate, keep the stock headgasket and call it a day.

User avatar
450sxtc
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 8:28 am
Car: 95 pearl vq'd s14 SE, 96 red s14 SE, 88 Rx-7 GXL, 90 GXL, 03 G35 Sedan, parting 91 q45

Post

I disagree. I think you should definately use that cometic gasket. Shave the head and run that head gasket with arp studs and you will be dealing with a very dependable motor without having to worry as much about blowing it.

TrunkMonkey
Posts: 3190
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 7:48 am
Car: 2000 Lincoln Navigator

Post

450sxtc wrote:I disagree. I think you should definately use that cometic gasket. Shave the head and run that head gasket with arp studs and you will be dealing with a very dependable motor without having to worry as much about blowing it.
unless you just need a peace of mind, the stock head gasket is strong enough to hold more than most people will ever throw at it.

tune the engine correctly and call it a day.

-demetrius

User avatar
WDRacing
Moderator
Posts: 15983
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 2:00 am
Car: 95 240SX, 99 BMW 540i, 01 Chevy Express, 14 Ford Escape
Location: MFFO
Contact:

Post

Studs and a new, other then stock, HG is a total waste of money. Money better spent on a ton of other go fast bits.

At 7psi you don't need ignition retard either. Just run slightly rich for daily driving and you'll be fine. Stay between 11.5 and 12/1 AF's. Not more then 12/1 on pump gas.

Brian

574-240sx
Posts: 9432
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 6:27 pm
Car: Nissans, Toyotas, Subaru

Post

I plan on throughing in the headgasket. I have an extra engine in case it blows. I will throw in my 91 cams while I'm at it. Thanks for the info. Nick

User avatar
cyrus240sx
Posts: 587
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 5:44 pm
Car: 95 240sx with five lug swap, rims, suspension, I H E, remote start, too bad its auto

Post

now can you run a turbo succesfully without a maf with you setup? becuz im thinking you would max it out even at 7psi.... someone correct me if im wrong

User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

WDRacing wrote:At 7psi you don't need ignition retard either. Just run slightly rich for daily driving and you'll be fine. Stay between 11.5 and 12/1 AF's. Not more then 12/1 on pump gas.

Brian


I disagree about the timing. KA's NEED timing retard, even at 6-7psi. Doesn't take much to blow up a KA with timing issues. Backing off the base timing at least, is a must.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

I ran 6.5 PSI on a FMU for a year with no detonation. I am running an E-Manage with 370's now and had to back off timing a bit, but that has to do with the fact that the ECU thinks less air is actually going into the motor then there actually is, so it adds more timing advance.

The stock timing curve is pretty conservative as it is. Considering it is written to run on 87 octane fuel. And at that the stock curve is such that at WOT, timing is advanced more similar to base timing(20 BTDC). Under cruising conditions is usually where timing tends to have the most advance as it sees less load and the advanced timing helps to save fuel.

User avatar
virus77
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:43 am
Car: 95 S14, 71 240z, 97 e320

Post

C-Kwik wrote:I ran 6.5 PSI on a FMU for a year with no detonation. I am running an E-Manage with 370's now and had to back off timing a bit, but that has to do with the fact that the ECU thinks less air is actually going into the motor then there actually is, so it adds more timing advance.

The stock timing curve is pretty conservative as it is. Considering it is written to run on 87 octane fuel. And at that the stock curve is such that at WOT, timing is advanced more similar to base timing(20 BTDC). Under cruising conditions is usually where timing tends to have the most advance as it sees less load and the advanced timing dhelps to save fuel.


Are you using the emanage like and SAFC to knock down the injectors to work( because it makes sense that this advances timing) but what if you use the injector harness, wont this work only to change your duty cycle and not effect the airflow signal so there wont be any adjustment to the ignition map other that what you make on with the ingnition harness. Does the injector correction feature on teh emanage use ariflow or duty cycle adjustment, cuz if its airflow thats pretty lame.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”