perana wrote:Ok. So there are 45s whith oval ports. Do ihave the rite 41 and the wrong 45? I dont know much about nissan,I boutgh my first about a year ago. A 96 300zxtt m/t . The car blew a gasket after 1 week and kept giving me trouble even after the rebuild. The made good power whith the nitrous but eventualy died. I fitted the 45 and zx trans in july and done nothing ever since. I have been told to much diffrent things. Why are u using a 41 is it a space issue? THANKS.
I'm aware of three versions of the VH41DE, one of them is not as good as the others (the US released one). The one from US cars has this ugly manifold that doesn't have tuned length runners, and I've read various opinions from people that it has a reduced block, amongst other things. That's one I'd steer right away from.
The other two versions I'm aware of are early & late jap spec, and came with the spider style intake manifold. Mine's an early spec with the full bells & whistles... you can tell these because the intake manifold & other aluminium parts are a plain, cast grey colour... with the TCS motor being black.
The other one however, has an anodised bronze/goldy intake manifold & throttle body, and the TCS motor is also a goldy colour. I do not know anything else about this particular version, if it's a later model motor, or just released in a car other than the Cima. I don't know whether it's had any engineering changes either.
What I can tell you is that the JDM VH41DE is equal in strength to the VH45DE, sharing the same design of main bearing beam, internals etc. The main real differences are in how the VTC is activated... the VH41 has the solenoids up by the intake runners, whereas the VH45 has them on the front of the cams. Furthermore, the VH41DE runs a slightly improved timing chain setup (worded carefully so we don't hurt anyone's feelings here ).
The two motors are almost identical in size... there's no real space issue as such. The VH45 looks much bigger and bulkier, but this is due to the fatter casting of the front cover, visible in a pic of ultrapulse's stripped down VH45. The biggest real advantage to running the VH41 is that the alternator is mounted at the top/front of the motor, and on the VH45 it's at the side where it can potentially interfere with chassis rails when being transplanted into other cars.
Another couple of differences between VH41 & VH45... the VH45 runs a tin sump which can take a bump or two, the VH41 has a thick cast alloy sump which would probably crack if it took an impact.
The rocker covers on a VH45 look different, with a little panel as long as the outside face on each side. The VH41 doesn't have this. Not sure what it's for.
Both motors share the same deck height, and an identical valvetrain. If you want the 4.5 litres but are doing a conversion, I'd suggest transplanting the VH45 crank & pistons into your VH41, that way you get the best of all worlds.
I'm doing this same rebuild next year.
elwesso wrote:41s are easier to get in aussie land... Why most aussie guys go with 41s and most everywhere else go with 45s, since the 45s were easy in places where the Q was sold...
Is your alternator mounted on the bottom side (by the AC compressor) or up in the middle?
According to Ezekial, VH41s are not that common in aussie, it's VH45s which are. VH41s are far more common here in NZ (different country to aussie) because we got brand new JDM cars. Aussie has far different importing laws, and as such they got screwed when it came to getting cars like skylines etc.
Modified by Mettler at 12:21 PM 12/4/2006