Post by
stebo0728 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/stebo0728-u126596.html
Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:00 am
Well again I wasnt intending to go the religious angle with this topic. You can certainly make a good set of arguments there, with Santa and how it seems he's been used to commercialize Christmas. Id argue it wasnt an effort to "remove Christ" but just businessmen being businessmen.
Here's where I have a big problem. I had good friends growing up in church that all lived in the same foster home. They always struggled, and never really had a Christmas. My parents or other church families would often help get them some Christmas gifts, but this really struck my heart, and as an adult now I participate in Clark's Kids here in Atlanta, where you chose a foster child, and buy some things from their Christmas list. Since having kids I make them involved, we chose kids their age, and really have a heartwarming time enjoying buying gifts for them. Its amazing you hear the normal snotty kids talk about all they want, and mine are that way quite often, but when we are doing this, they really focus in on what they want this other kid to have, and yes sometimes its stuff they want too, but I think it really does well in keeping with the real reason of the season. But I say this because I really struggled imaging a belief system in a figure who brings toys to all the good girls and boys, and reconciling that with thousands of kids around the country, and millions around the globe who get NOTHING. I imagine my kids asking "so are these kids bad, is that why Santa doesnt visit them?" Of course not, so while my kids may ruin Santa for their peers occasionally, they know what the real deal is, and are grounded in it.
Again there is not right or wrong answer to the Santa thing, and I dont begrudge anyone who embraces it with their kids, I just dont get it myself, and dont feel that I've shorted my kids in anyway by not fostering this false belief in them.
Bud, I also walked that Halloween thin line, both as a child and now as a parent, so I feel your pain. As for my faith springing from The Enlightenment, I dont know if I quite agree, but I see where you're going. You're probably not too far off in saying that, but basically I am whats known as an Apologist. I belive that the God of the Bible, the God of Christianity, is the same as "mother nature". The seemingly chaotic, random acts that we see in the universe are actually systematic architectural achievements, we just dont know all the rules to the system, and we cant see the architect. What I mean is, I guess what my central tenant is, is that if mankind was given an "ultimate understanding" of the universe, in it we would see God and all of his wisdom. I dont pretend to believe we will ever have that, at least not this side of eternity, but my goal is to get as close as possible, not to become God, and not to remove faith, but just to have a better personal understanding.
As for Col. 3:2, I dont take that to mean it quite as literally as KJV may say it. When it says "think of" I take that in more of a "worry about" or "long for" sort of way. Maybe that doesnt help to make it reconcile for you, but it does me. And what I meant by those words, is that, we know for a fact, as adults, that the Santa myth is just that, its hogwash, yet we encourage our children to believe it. Its really no different than teaching our kids in elementary school, that the world is flat, then Geography 101 suddenly says its round. We know the world isnt flat, but do we want our kids to believe it is? Just because its fun? I dont have any problem at all teaching faith and belief in the unseen or the unknown, but the difference is, with normal faith we are teaching things that we ourselves believe. But with Santa we are teaching a belief in something we know to be bogus, that doesnt compute for me. Again not knocking those who do it, just explaining why it doesnt compute for me.