teambuiltnissan wrote:well 489 is just a base pull.. I added intake manifold, 80mm throttle body, 1600cc injectors, new garett t04r BB should be interesting to see ... I just dont have a time to do anything since I am organizing the contaier from back home (japan) plus got 8 cars as up yesterday that I will be working this week..
whenever I find the time I will see the the number that I would like to see with VP import on 30psi+.
I am also working to find out how well will stock sr20 ecu will work with 1600cc injectos.. those for rom tuning.
dee. I am just trying to help other but I can careless what other poeple say if they dont listen. thta is not my problem. and also its not a problem for me to shut up . and I dont think I ever say anything about wrong about what I do and what I have showed. eveyrthing is shows my work and proof is car is runing like first day after 1.5 years and over 10000 hard miles.
I tunes and builts car for living and garage paddy is working with me to fill in insight of CA engine.
that is something that you dont have but I know that you know about ca engine than anyone else in US.. but that does not mean you can call BS on alot of thing that you dont agree with. but again I am trying to give you guys little of insight of what I do and what we do so rest of sr20 community dont give a crap on ca.. ca or sr.. both engine are great.. its just different.
matter in fact paddy is coming to my work sometimes this month. we have little bussiness to disscuss. we will have alot of dyno time at my shop. BTW. dee I emailed you..
Hey man, I only used the B.S. icon on the miles per gallon issue, not your tuning abilities or anything else. I do realize that I may have been a bit premature to raise the B.S. flag as I am doing my best to attempt to validate you high mpg claim on a high performance motor. If I can get anywhere near 28mpg (like say 25mpg), I will personally apologize to you in front of all other members, remove the BS flag icon and edit my original post.
If I drive my car normally, I may get as little as 13mpg (city) and maybe 17-18mpg (hwy). As of now, I'm driving the car like a straight-up bytch only gunning it to get out of the far lane just to get off on an exit and this driving may very well yield 20+mpg. But with a car like what you have and a car like I have with my car being the lighter of the two, there is no way sanely possible for you not to enjoy it and be mileage conscious.
So do any of you agree that, if you do not romp on the pedal, keep speeds under 70mph and keep vacuum below -10hg by keeping that throttle plate closed as much as possible, it will yield decent mile per gallon, but at the same time possibly defeat the purpose of owning a turbocharged car? I'll get back to you guys when my tank runs low and teambuilt, I'll check my mail in a minute.
Keep up the good work and keep the group informed with your collaboration with garage paddy; that ought to be interesting as well. Hopefully within the next month, I can get a few cars I worked-on including my own to a dyno to see if they can break the 500whp barrier. I believe they can, but we won't jump the gun as of yet.
Dee