Post by
Exar-Kun »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/exar-kun-u1725.html
Fri Dec 13, 2002 9:14 am
"More horsepower=less reliable in all applications even turbo. There is a reason nitrous is considered to be the best "bang for the buck"....."
uh. negative, a well built turbo engine will last far longer than nitrous injected one. nitrous has a horrible tendancy to cause detonation, and cause odd engine problems after long use.
I know turbo can cause detonation, but Im talking about flip of the switch "kaboom" type stuff. nitrous is considered best bnag-for-buck because it is cheap HP. but its not reliable HP. turbos are.and who the hell gave you the idea that more HP means its less reliable, your on crack. look at the m5 V-8. that sucker will run for 80k and puts out 400hp. almost 3 times as much as most civics, or even 240's.-chetanything can break if you do it wrong, nitous is usually run very haphazardly to keep costs low(thus the 'bang for buck' you refer to). a good nitrous controll system costs about 1200 dollars or more, with tank, warmer, ECU plug in, switches, jets, and progressive FMU and Nitrous pressure regulators. without those, your literally flooding your engine with more oxygen(thats what it does) than its calibrated to take, causeing serious problems(detonation for example) since nitrous systems dont use any feed in to the ECU, MAF< etc, as a turbo system does.