Hicas steering rack vs standard

ONLY for ADVANCED technical discussion about the 240sx!
eyesoreracing
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:05 pm

Post

My steering rack just barfed all over the garage floor (while parked, strange) so it's time for a new one. I hear rumor that the HICAS rack is quicker than the standard power rack, but I can't find any numbers to back it up. I dug through my 21-year Road and Track library and found that the HICAS steering rack was a 14.9:1 ratio, but two years earlier, when they tested the non-HICAS car, they listed turns lock-to-lock instead of steering ratio. Useless.

Anybody know what the steering ratio is on the standard rack?

What does the HICAS rack look like? I assume there are some extra fittings on it. Do I loop them, or can I just cap them off? What kind of fittings are they?

Thanks for any help you can give, I'm picking up a rebuilt rack (I found a place that has both) tuesday afternoon, so the quickest answer saves the day.

-Dave


ziggy682
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 10:34 pm
Car: 1991 240SX Turbo

Post

Non Hicas lock to lock = 3.1

Hicas lock to lock = 2.6

So, the Hicas rack is quicker, but it's not a huge difference.

eyesoreracing
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:05 pm

Post

lock to lock is a pretty useless measurement. I just swapped a WRX rack into a Forester. Both cars are 3 turns lock to lock, but the Forester is 19:1 while the WRX is 15.2:1. The Forester happens to go to 14:1 or so near the ends of the rack, so it catches up in the lock-to-lock game. In the middle, where you drive, the difference between 19:1 and 15.2:1 is huge.

You could probably assume both 240SX racks turn the same total amount, but you can't assume that going from one car to another, so the lock-to-lock thing is even more useless. All mitsubishis seem to take abou half a mile to make a U-turn. Who cares if it's only two turns lock-to-lock if the wheels only turn 10 degrees?

ziggy682
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 10:34 pm
Car: 1991 240SX Turbo

Post

Okay, since you don't care about lock to lock...

Non-Hicas rack = 17.1

Hicas rack = 14.9

So, the Hicas rack is quicker, and has fewer turns lock to lock.

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

i have a hicas rack i made to manual and its a ***** to turn stopped or at low speeds.... i want a manual one, any one ever hear of one that fits the s13?

eyesoreracing
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:05 pm

Post

ziggy682 wrote:Okay, since you don't care about lock to lock...

Non-Hicas rack = 17.1

Hicas rack = 14.9

So, the Hicas rack is quicker, and has fewer turns lock to lock.


Thanks, that's great! Where did you find those numbers?

-Dave

eyesoreracing
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 10:05 pm

Post

E Dogg wrote:i have a hicas rack i made to manual and its a ***** to turn stopped or at low speeds.... i want a manual one, any one ever hear of one that fits the s13?


That rack would suck as a manual. Just curious, why don't you put a power steering pump on it?

-Dave

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

i like feel of it at speed and cornering... dont belive me disconnect ur p/s belt and try quick, can try long though its the water pump belt too haha

ziggy682
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 10:34 pm
Car: 1991 240SX Turbo

Post

eyesoreracing wrote:Thanks, that's great! Where did you find those numbers?

-Dave


Straight from the FSM. You can find it in PDF form floating around the internet if you look hard enough. I don't remember the website where I got it, but I'm sure someone has a link to it.

Chingon
Posts: 2802
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:45 am
Car: 1991 and 1992 hatchbacks

Post

E Dogg wrote:i have a hicas rack i made to manual and its a ***** to turn stopped or at low speeds.... i want a manual one, any one ever hear of one that fits the s13?


I've been wanting a mechanical rack too and am wondering how bad a converted hydraulic is compared to a manual?

I mean a mech. rack is hard enough from parking, I can't imagine it being that much harder...

EastCoast240
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:20 pm

Post

How will you keep tension on the water pump belt if the power steering pump is removed?

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

now i jus thave the pump on ther not plumbed to anything, in future ill get smaller belt or make an idler pulley with p/s bracket...

Chingon
Posts: 2802
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 8:45 am
Car: 1991 and 1992 hatchbacks

Post

EastCoast240 wrote:How will you keep tension on the water pump belt if the power steering pump is removed?


you get a smaller belt....:pface

and if you ditch the a/c...then you go w/a serpentine system...:ylsuper

EastCoast240
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:20 pm

Post

Chingon wrote:you get a smaller belt....:pface

and if you ditch the a/c...then you go w/a serpentine system...:ylsuper


I've already ditched the A/C.....I know you'll obviously have to get a smaller belt, but the adjustment for the belt is on the power steering pump.

Has anyone made up some kind of tensioner after removing the power steering?

Does anyone know the part number for the short belt needed to run the water pump with the P/S eliminated?

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

i have no ac already all i need is 1 for alt... im lookin into getting a crank pulley that has1 grove for belts instead of 3 as well but i got more pertinant things to fix 1st

EastCoast240
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:20 pm

Post

E Dogg wrote:i have no ac already all i need is 1 for alt... im lookin into getting a crank pulley that has1 grove for belts instead of 3 as well but i got more pertinant things to fix 1st


You must be running a belt for the water pump??

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

yeha for now i have the ps pump on and not hooked up just to tension water pump, but in future i may just spacer the alt pulley out and use only 1 belt, or make another custom setup of some kind

EastCoast240
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:20 pm

Post

The pump doesn't whine with no fluid and the belt hooked up?

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

it makes a little noise but not as much as my ehxhaust does so its no big deal

edit: its temporary till i find better solution

User avatar
black s13
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:27 am

Post

the belt size is floating around FA somewhere, i wasnt able to find it. basically you take the WP pulley off, but the belt around it and stretch it back onto the studs. a few guys have done it, they say it works fine.

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

id love to know size if ne one has....

User avatar
black s13
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:27 am

Post

the numbering on belts is generic. its like # of ribs-legnth in mm, so for example a 3 rib, 300mm belt would be a 3-300. basically just measure what you think you need, and go to the auto parts store. if its too big, get one legnth smaller.

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

i live in ia its all inches and they are in 1/2 increments locally b/c normally u can adj with tensioner

User avatar
black s13
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:27 am

Post

on the carborad around the belts at the store theres a number. thats the ribs and legnth. go look at the packages and figure the code out, im not sure how it reads.

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

thanks for info (im havin mixed htoughts bout removing ac:( )

User avatar
hondahunter180
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 2003 audi a4 - 1969 bmw 2002 - 1990 s13 (sold)

Post

E Dogg wrote:i like feel of it at speed and cornering... dont belive me disconnect ur p/s belt and try quick, can try long though its the water pump belt too haha


wtf???

User avatar
hondahunter180
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 2003 audi a4 - 1969 bmw 2002 - 1990 s13 (sold)

Post

dont remove your ac!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i did it and could not notice any power increase, plus its about to get hot, i wished i had left my ac

User avatar
E Dogg
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 9:02 am
Car: 1997 M3 sedan
1988 TII RX-7 10th AE
1990 Ford Bronco XLT

Post

sorry i was saying you can test the non power steering feel by revmoving your belt, but its your water pump belt too so you can only for a few minutes


Return to “240SX Technical Forum”