Right, a car for the fan bois...LambJerky wrote:
That was a stupid response. I am simply arguing against everyone saying it is some great marvel. It's a car for the fanboys.
Pound for pound it isn't very good.
Right, a car for the fan bois...LambJerky wrote:
That was a stupid response. I am simply arguing against everyone saying it is some great marvel. It's a car for the fanboys.
Pound for pound it isn't very good.
Man has a point...I have seen more from less.LambJerky wrote:Garbage. They should all be in lakes. 16.4 liters, 16 cylinders, quad-turbo.
Only 1000hp?
Fanboys of what?Bugatti doesnt have fanboys....the EB110 is the only gatti i like and thats just cuz it looks like a supercar version of the Z32.LambJerky wrote:It's a car for the fanboys
I do agree with this though.The SSC Aero is a V8 and has 1 supercharger half the cylinders and it makes similar HP and goes faster.LambJerky wrote:Garbage. They should all be in lakes.16.4 liters, 16 cylinders, quad-turbo.
Only 1000hp?
Fanboys because they believe the words of Jeremy Clarkson to be the words of Jesus Christ.Nali wrote:
Fanboys of what?
Dude, my IQ is low enough.I dont want it reaching profound levels....but i fear if i try dissecting what you are/were trying to say in that post i might actually achieve Profound Retardation.Could you please, rephrase that in a way thats easier to understand for people with low IQs?Cuz as is, i dont see an answer to the question i asked earlier.LambJerky wrote:
Fanboys because they believe the words of Jeremy Clarkson to be the words of Jesus Christ.
It's just a car of numbers, and numbers make ignoramuses (that's actually a word?) want many things. It sounds really cool.
The video of the crash is another perfect example, he thought it was a Lamborghini and it was his dream car. He knew nothing about it, it just looked cool to him and wanted it because Lamborghini has a desirable reputation. But it wasn't one...
It wasn't that complex of a response. People like it because they feel as though they should. Fads and styles, bandwagons... That is what the fanboys love; what everybody else does.Nali wrote:
Dude, my IQ is low enough.
So you think people like the Veyron simple because other people like it?Not because they genuinely like the car.LambJerky wrote:People like it because they feel as though they should. Fads and styles, bandwagons... That is what the fanboys love; what everybody else does.
The Bugatti Veyron is a car that was designed and engineered for Fanboys of CarsLambJerky wrote:But I'll keep it Kindergarten for you and just fill the blank with "cars". You win!
Says the owner of the 240SX. Oh the irony,the sickly-sweet irony.LambJerky wrote:It's a car for the fanboys.
Cause and effect.LambJerky wrote:Garbage. They should all be in lakes. 16.4 liters, 16 cylinders, quad-turbo.
Only 1000hp?
Bullcrap. You could claim that about anything. Since when is there some universal barrier against building a decent transmission?Looneybomber wrote:Cause and effect.
Umm...it's not so much that it can't make more HP.
The development of the car was delayed 2yrs because they couldn't get a reliable enough transmission to handle all the power. Also, 10 radiators...you've gotta get rid of the 1000hp worth of heat somehow.
So sure, they could make more power, but they'd have to get a new transmission and more radiators (where would they put them?)
Remember, everything is a compromise.
The ban hammer is coming your way in the form of a mod/adminjimmy1 wrote:hi guys,,,,
nice discussion is going on i really enjoyed it,,,
and helpful for me ,,,
and it should be helpful to others,,,,
thanks,,,,