the crown is so heavy, its nice to let someone else handle it for a whileAZhitman wrote:Yeah, that's a stretch on a lot of counts, Homey.
One, it's not terribly fair to slap a label like "prostitute" on someone who's done nothing to deserve it. That's like digging on someone's kids or spouse. You're above that.
Two, she was nowhere near the Presidency. Obama won handily, and even if he hadn't, McCain will outlive all of us.
Three...well... weren't you JUST drilling the "comments" section of another craptastic website? Don't look now, but the 1/10th of the story on that "blog" is followed by some commentary from some real "mental giants".
You're slipping. Don't let IBC take the belt from you, Champ.
they gave up manual labor about the time of moses.AZhitman wrote:Yeah, but he keeps DROPPING it!!!
He's got those frail, pasty, academically-sculpted, Jewish liberal arms.


we do our best. its like taebo, but better.AZhitman wrote:You guys are lucky... Running in sandals and throwing rocks at tanks will do wonders for the physique.
IBCoupe wrote:Hey! I resemble those remarks!
Tariq, I'm learning how to predict which links you're going to post. I know your secret, farker!
I didn't read the article, and it wouldn't surprise me if a portion of it went to supporting families of 9/11 victims or some such (whether it would if no one had noticed the fee, on the other hand, is another matter completely). That said, Palin's got a habit of charging a lot of money to hear her speak, so I also wouldn't be surprised if a larger portion went to feeding her (present and) future campaign.
No Drudge?!?heliochrome85 wrote:IBCoupe wrote:Hey! I resemble those remarks!
Tariq, I'm learning how to predict which links you're going to post. I know your secret, farker!
I didn't read the article, and it wouldn't surprise me if a portion of it went to supporting families of 9/11 victims or some such (whether it would if no one had noticed the fee, on the other hand, is another matter completely). That said, Palin's got a habit of charging a lot of money to hear her speak, so I also wouldn't be surprised if a larger portion went to feeding her (present and) future campaign.
its among the dozens of blogs and sites i read a day:
The Washington Post
The Atlantic Monthly
Andrew Sullivan
The Economist
The New Republic
The New York Times
Politico.com
FoxNews.com
Slate.com
Salon.com
The New Yorker
The Spectator
The Christian Science Monitor
and Foreign Policy Magazine
those are the major ones. If i post something from fark, its usually picked up by the other media outlets. That being said, Fark is a site for wacky news. In this day and age, little that this country's politicians can do, could not be considered wacky.
AZhitman wrote:No "American Thinker"? No al-Jazeera?
Dammit Tariq.