My $.021. If you are super concerned about fuel economy, the CVT might not be right. We are getting about 27.5 with it in mixed suburban driving.2. I'm not sure what you mean about "good" for the CVT, but we really like it. It's not a racecar but it sure feels a lot better than other small cars.3.The console lights and instrument panel I feel are nicely lighted. All of the buttons on the steering wheel in the SL are not lit however. This includes cruise control, audio, and bluetooth.4.I think it's widely considered the that configurator on Nissan.com is broken, others can confirm if they have the configuration you mentioned5.No TPMS issues with ours, obviously lots of others have had problems though.6. This car is a stealth! Anything under 3k rpm is amazingly quiet.shadu wrote:1) How the fuel economy as i drive 90% city2) Is the CVT good at sppeds and city?3) Are the knobs on dash and steering wheel and etc Illuminated at nights other models coz we have a XB and its really hard to see the knobs at night coz its dark u cant see anything unless u have a night vision glasses4) When i build the car its didnt allow me to get the ABS if i tried the bluetooth option and vice versa so is it so???5) I have seen lot of thread abt the TPMS problems so its there anything else to be considered besides TPMS problems6) Is it noisy from inside like the road noise and engine noise???
There's a rumor floating around that Nissan website is set this way because they are trying to restrict the amount of ABS equipped SL's in the hopes of saving as many ABS modules for the new Sentra's. But there are members that have ABS equipped SL's so Nissan's making them. It's just a rumor, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was true. I'm pretty sure they've gotten many complaints about the "website flaw". If it was an actual flaw, it probably would've been fixed by now. It's set for some reason. Not sure though.shadu wrote:4) When i build the car its didnt allow me to get the ABS if i tried the bluetooth option and vice versa so is it so???
\electech wrote:I have the SL with the CVT and Convenience pkg. We absolutely love it. It is well lit, like someone else said though, the steering wheel buttons are not. But all the other controls, including the door lock and window buttons are all lit. It is a very nice car for the money. We love the CVT, with this tranny, the engine is only turning 2400 rpm at 70mph. With the six speed I drove, it is right at 3000 rpm. The only dislike has been the gas mileage and it is trending up as the miles go up. I started off from 28 to 29 and now, at 4100 miles, it has been over 32. The tank before the one I am on now was a little over 33. Still not sticker, but getting better. For city driving, you can't beat it. There is a learning curve associated with this tranny. It is nothing big, just different from anything you have ever driven.
As far as how the CVT works, it is in the simplest terms, a variable speed pulley setup. Now before you go thinking you are getting a golf cart setup, remember they use some form of this type tranny in everything up to bulldozers!! If I can find the link, I will post it here of the company that actually builds these for Nissan. Maybe someone else will beat me to it. There are no gears, it just "shifts out" to vary the final drive ratio. I absolutely love it.
Now, the only problems so far have been new car bugs. My TPMS problem turned out to be two bad wheel sensors, both on the rear. My airbag cover on the dash on the passenger side also was not assembled correctly and was replaced. Other than that, it has been rattle free, quite on the road, rides very smooth, has good snap to its takeoff and is an all around good little car. Good luck with your purchase.
The red line on the Tach? That's the go fast line. Once you get up to it, thousands of little magic go fast pixies begin to come alive. They dance and party until they burst with excitement. When they burst, you see them in the form of rods, pistons, and cracked cylinder heads. Just KiddingBKKloppenborg wrote:\
Thanks Nice to know DANG 2,300 at 70 MPH Thats good i think lower then my Parents Honda Accord 2004 with 5 speed auto. i think it goes like 3,000-3500 at 70. Hey what is the redline for the nissan Versa?
Damn Govenor takes away all the fun!!!! So about 115 for Versa my 79 Benz goes that fast! Its a Turbo Dissel damn new chips.BenDupre wrote:Redline is at 6500, but I think the govenor won't let you anywhere near that. Ben
1) Someone mentioned that "other cars" might be more suited to straight city driving. Those would be hybrids, since they are more efficient in the city than the highway because you're driving mostly on the electric motors. However, paying $5000-$20000 more (depending on which Hybrid you're talking about) may not be worth the huge savings. That said, I'm getting 30 in the city without being particularly ginger on my 6-speed.shadu wrote:1) How the fuel economy as i drive 90% city2) Is the CVT good at sppeds and city?3) Are the knobs on dash and steering wheel and etc Illuminated at nights other models coz we have a XB and its really hard to see the knobs at night coz its dark u cant see anything unless u have a night vision glasses4) When i build the car its didnt allow me to get the ABS if i tried the bluetooth option and vice versa so is it so???5) I have seen lot of thread abt the TPMS problems so its there anything else to be considered besides TPMS problems6) Is it noisy from inside like the road noise and engine noise???
Well said. What possible reason could you have, BKK, to go that fast?Ever Victorious wrote:Noone.. EVER... needs to go 115 on a public road. I've got the need for speed also, but I take it to the autocross track where it is safe and legal to be an idiot.
EV's right, there should be no reason you should need to get over 115 on public roads (even up to that speed). This is why cops normally don't let you off with a warning at these speeds. Even if you are the type of person who does street races, most times you don't get up this this speed. Partly because street races are so short anyway. Plus street/pickup races are more about hp to weight ratios than speed. There's a good chance there will never be a programmer to defeat the governor, so you're going to be stuck with it. If you need more speed, you should look into an actual performance vehicle or bike. Whatever you choose, please take it to the track.Ever Victorious wrote:Edit: And the governor is there for your safety. Noone.. EVER... needs to go 115 on a public road. I've got the need for speed also, but I take it to the autocross track where it is safe and legal to be an idiot.
Meh, everyone's gone faster than they should have at one point. I normally drive about 75 (mostly freeways here). I was in the same situation. One time I was late for work and had about 15 mins to get through a 30 min drive. 140mph on the highway at 3:15 in the morning. I was 19 at the time. I made it in enough time, but I also realized that if I had woke up earlier, there would be no need for all that speed. Every now and again you want to stretch your cars legs. Everyone's tore down that backroad with no cars on it to see how fast they can go. But you should try to stay away from that. Not only can you hurt someone you can't see until it's too late, but you can also hurt yourself. Most times the hardest part about not speeding is over coming your urges. Use your speed responsibly.BKKloppenborg wrote:I have only gone 115, ONCE in Benz and that was because i was Late for Work and it was 6:00 in the morning usally i drive at 70-75. I dont usally drive that fast unless i really need to and their is light traffic.
I am not dumb enough to street race.