So I was looking at this chart on the Nissan website:
http://www.nissan.ca/vehicles/en/ and I thought to myself, "Yeah, everything is in the right place. Heavy Titan and Armada on the right, light Versa and Sentra on the left." But then I thought what about when the issue is not simply weight but power and performance? The Altima, Maxima, 350Z, and GT-R are all V6 engines and roughly the same weight (relatively speaking at least) but there's a clear progression between these cars' fuel consumption. So I ask you guys, why is each in this list of four more thirsty than the last?
I know, I know, more fuel injected = more fuel burned, and performance cars with a turbo influencing the fuel monitoring system love to push tons of air and fuel into the combustion chamber, BUT, why doesn't the faster burn rate increase the power output and in turn reduce the amount of fuel required to achieve a set speed. For example, if all four cars were in a line and they drove down the same road and set their cruise at 50 mph, why wouldn't the extra fuel injected into the GT-R cause a corresponding increase in power output which would then trigger the cruise control to ease up on the throttle a little bit and reduce the fuel input? The maintained rate of consumption would then more or less match the other cars, would it not?
I know there's got to be a problem somewhere in this circular logic, but I don't know what it is.