lol...not letting go, eh? Okay, I'll bite. I've stated from the beginning that my thoughts pertain to my car with quotes (unedited from their originality) such as:
Ilya wrote:Sport mode on the M isn't that much different than the regular mode...at least on my M56.
Ilya wrote:The M56x in Standard behaves almost ENTIRELY the same as the M56x in Sport. -- I guess this can be misconstrued as me making a blanket statement but in the same post further down I state that I'm referring to my M --
On the M (at least the M56x I have with UpRev and HPS intake hoses)...
Ilya wrote:All I simply said was that, in my UpRev'ed '11, there is virtually zero difference between sport and standard. Now, between sport/standard and ECO or SNOW? Yeah, definitely a difference.
Ilya wrote:** IN MY OPINION AKA UNSCIENTIFIC ** -- referring to my experiences with both cars thus only referring to MY M --
G DOES behave much sportier when put into DS/Sport mode...shifts are CLEARLY better. This gives the sensation of more power/balls.
M DOES NOT behave much sportier when put into Sport mode...shifts are CLEARLY the same...
My thinking was that, if in fact sport/standard on MY M were different...
I did say this after a few posts in this thread of me talking about my specific car after getting annoyed and thus :
Ilya wrote:Who said anything about power increase? I'm referring to the same throttle sensitivity and transmission performance. The G clearly has that stuff change between modes while the M does not. -- referring to the ones I've driven as loaners and mine based on my personal experience --
Regardless, on the M (which we all drive) it's virtually mute and we're arguing semantics. Moving along... -- this is the gotcha that you guys evidently are letting override all of my other posts in this thread --
I made one post out of like 8 in this thread that was for sure a blanket statement (whoa! My bad! Stop the presses!) and people are arguing with me over it lol. In all but one of my posts, I have been referring to my specific car and have been clear about that.
Bottom line is, without proving out the UpRev theory by removing UpRev...we simply don't know if UpRev is at fault for my experience or if it's my M in general...for all we know it's not UpRev and my earlier blanket statement is more valid than initially thought. Unfortunately, this M community is small and we don't represent all M's in the world...so even if YOU guys say that 5 cars in here exhibit change (thus, as an example, making blanket statements such as "UpRev is the difference in your car") or I say that 1 car does not exhibit change (thus, as an example, ME saying "UpRev isn't the difference in my car")...neither one of us can say that with 100% certainty until a UpRev vs Non-UpRev test can be performed on the SAME car (whether mine or someone else's). Everyone is making blanket statements otherwise. Perhaps I will take the time to unflash UpRev and go back to 100% stock.
Also, Seymore64 (who's tuned many cars) is a good UpRev tuner and many members here have been tuned by him so it's not an issue of the tuner leaving settings, etc. Guy knows these cars.
Here is the layout of MY maps (users can have any 5 maps they want):
#1 - Stock OEM Map
#2 - Performance Map
#3 - ECO Map
#4 - Valet Mode (25mph max/3krpm max - can be configured)
#5 - Anti-Theft (car won't start and if switched to this map while car is running the car will die after sputtering for 3-4 seconds)
Now...is it possible that the maps only relate to AFR and thus the #1 map isn't any different in terms of shifting, etc.? Sure. Is it possible that UpRev overrides every mode as far as timing advance, etc. thus getting most modes on a 'level' field? Sure. But I don't have that information for you.
So thus, as I've said before, "in my application" there is no difference. Whether that's UpRev or just the way my car is...beats me. Perhaps one day soon I'll remove UpRev and find out.
Carry on with the debate of DS being a glitch or not........................................
