I bought Vredestein UltraC tires. They have been getting rave reviews the past 3-4 years but have gone unnoticed here in the states until the past few months. They are now standard equipment on several reputable cars (Aston Martin, Bugatti, etc.). I got fronts and rears for $620 shippedBadQ45t wrote:Hey, couple of questions...what kind of tires did you buy? Are you planning to roll your fenders in the rear?
As for rims, in 19" at less than 500 it is going to be slim pickings for new rims. I would have said look for 20" FX rims but since you already own those tires, you might look for some 06' M45 rims, I scored a set for my 97' but have not mounted them yet. You will need to use 1" spacers to make them work, but a few people have already done it. They look really nice, they are OEM quality, and made by Enkie so they are high quality.
I'm afraid at 500 is not much for this side, but others might chime in on this...of course you couldn't stagger the size.
Okay you say you want Work, BBS, LM,... well instead of searching for wheels that will do, why don't you just save up and get the wheels that you really want? Sure you might be happy with the wheels you get, but in the back of your head you'll say yeah these are nice but I wish I had those Work wheels, BBS...., but that's just my 2 cents.cullenj76 wrote:I just bought tires: 245/35ZR19 for the front and 275/30ZR19 for the rear. I'm going to buy 19x8 for the front and 19x9.5 for the rear. The wheels that I want, I cannot afford (Work, BBS LM, Volk, etc.). I'm looking to spend no more than $500/wheel. I think the Q needs a healthy-wide 5-spoke or a mesh wheel.
Yeah what happened to Blake Bauer, our NICO guy at TR?Rex wrote:BTW the BBS RS-GT in 19x8.5 are on "special/closeout" on TireRack (NICO sponsor) for $549, which is ana amazing price for that wheel new.
If you choose to get them, please either mention NICO when you call, or click the TireRack banner .
IIRC, he either moved on in their organization or to another one. He was well liked, but then again most good people are in high demand.maxnix wrote:Yeah what happened to Blake Bauer, our NICO guy at TR?
Are you sure on that number? Even the "no-name" wheels that were on my 94 Q when I bought it are stamped as 690kgs (if we choose to believe manufacturers ratings).maxnix wrote:strong (650 kgs.)
Actually the front tires are a 93 and the rears are 96 which will be completely fine. If you can find me a 245/35-19 with a load rating higher than 93 (not XL) I'll paypal you $5.00.maxnix wrote:Yeah what happened to Blake Bauer, our NICO guy at TR?
He was amazingly helpful in fittting my 18x9 OZ Racing Superleggera wheels as a non-specified fitment. Way under $500 per wheel, by the way, and strong (650 kgs.) and as light (20 lbs.) as the OEM 16x7.
As for your front tire, at 91 it is three points under the OEM minimum load rating, so neither a good nor a safe choice. Along with the larger rear increasing understeer, not a performance upgrade either.
Vredestein is known primarily as a bicycle tire manufacturer ( http://www.vredesteinusa.com/ ), and as an out of date classic automobile tire manufacturer. My experience with them is they do not last nor maintain balance very long (maybe 5K?). Bottom line, you get for what you pay.
Joe can make some great deals on Volk Racing.
94 is OEM minimum for a FY33. Higher load rating (all other tire characteristics being equal, which they never are across brands) is better, so your studied aversion to XL rated tires is performance limiting. My PS2 work great and are XL rated at 98.cullenj76 wrote:Actually the front tires are a 93 and the rears are 96 which will be completely fine. If you can find me a 245/35-19 with a load rating higher than 93 (not XL) I'll paypal you $5.00.
Thanks for the history on Vredestein, but what tire experience with Vredesteins are you speaking of because it contradicts all personal encounters that I'm aware of? 5kmi. balance? Was your experience with bias-belted tires or something
Did you happen to score low in the reading comprehension portion of placement tests?maxnix wrote:94 is OEM minimum for a FY33. Higher load rating (all other tire characteristics being equal, which they never are across brands) is better, so your studied aversion to XL rated tires is performance limiting. My PS2 work great and are XL rated at 98.
I do admire all your pointless, smartass comments. Just think how useful you could be if your posts had purpose!maxnix wrote:I do admire all those M5 and M3 you have personally owned, though. Just think how good they would have been with real high performance tires!
Yeah, the SportsEngine wheels just didn't look right.I'm excited. I worked hard on getting the perfect (for me) offset. They'll extend exactly 18mm more that your wheels in the front and extend 4mm more than your rears. I didn't want it to stick out beyond the fender at all, but I absolutely did not want the wheels "sucked in". We'll see, but I'm anxious.Falkdesigns wrote:I can't wait to see your Q with the AME's!!!
I saw some of the Sports Engine wheels at the EXC show, they didn't look too hot, but they were on a Lexus LS which has different offset and that probably had something to do with it.
The difference is large because my widths are 9" and 10" instead of yours at 8" and 9.5"Falkdesigns wrote:Interesting, mine are +20 front and rear, how is the offset so different if numerically it's only 5mm less in front and 2mm more in back? The Super Low disk I assume?
Anyhow, I hope to have new wheels by November too, if I do, and if I have my Navi / DVD system in place then I'll show my car at HIN VIP show. I should probably put my wheels in the for sale forum to get the word out now.