Post by
roguetoad »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/roguetoad-u98427.html
Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:26 am
Phillipa Interesting comment about engine braking. Click & Clack definitely agree with you. Brakes are for decelerating, engines for accelerating. However, not as much fun to spare the downshifts.
And that raises an interesting question: Wonder how the Nissan CVT will handle lots of downshifting longterm vs, say, a Toyota 5-Spd AT?
Re mileage, we're doing low 30s without hypermiling. And after a decent break-in, we'll bet we can hit 40. (We've hit 55 MPG on our wife's FIT, without any really serious hypermiling).
FWIW, we've found over many years that paying close attention, looking ahead, being smooth, balancing the vehicle underway, understanding the engine's power band, load management, and where to place the car so the engine is working the most efficiently, and proper maintenance are about the best things one can do to maintain consistent high numbers.
In our experience an MPG gauge will be somewhat inaccurate unless you opt for scientific-grade testers. Gauges are also distracting enough that they might hinder mileage, because they take focus away from traffic.
That said, anything that'll improve a driver's awareness of driving has got to be a good thing.
We used to participate in the Mobil Economy Runs and SCCA, NASCAR, and Kart/Enduro racing and found that global awareness of road and vehicle conditions usually did more to up MPG than easily available gadgets. And on race tracks, awareness and smoothness also does more than a gadget (unless you can control fuel pressure).
Unfortunately, the size of the typography on the Rogue's hinder's one's ability to decipher accurately in a quick scan. Gauges in overhead consoles, or on mirrors are definitely distracting. Just looking ahead and driving smooth will beat a gauge any day. That's our $0.02 and experience anyway.
Modified by roguetoad at 10:36 AM 6/11/2008