VimyJ wrote:We zone out on Rap and Reality TV and they are studying violin and engineering. We laud the lowest common denominator and they aim for the pinnacles of culture. We fall and they climb. We set our standards low and they set their standards high.
Once again, absolute brilliance from Mike - Why do you think I rail against the crap that's on TV, the crap that's fed to "sheep" consumers (domestic disposable cars) and the crap that the media tells us is "quality". Hype has become a synonym for quality, and it's just abhorrent.
BTW - I have driven several cars/trucks this past week that I'd like to comment on:
Drove a customer's 2000 Camaro - I'd rather have a 2000 Hyundai. What a POS this car was - Poor visibility, clunky steering, ponderous acceleration and the most horrible ergonomics and switchgear of anything since my wife's old 86 Sunbird.
Drove a 2002 Corvette Convertible. Insert almost all comments from the Camaro, just less vehemently. No power top? WTF?
2003 Lightning - Just like the Mustang 5.0: Great drivetrain in a tarted-up base model vehicle. Close, but no thanks at $26K.
New RSX Type S - What's all the fuss about? G35 sedan would eat this thing for lunch. Nasty interior, looks like it was designed by the "Naaaawssss" kid from F & F.
The new Chevy pickup/roadster thing (so memorable I forgot the name - SSR or some such nonsense)... Slug. Heavy, slow and dull. Again, someone's been playing in the GM parts bin, as it looks like an amalgamation of all the other GM garbage, especially the switchgear and the latches/hinges and underhood bits.
Various Centurys, Malibus, Intrepids and a couple PT Losers - Sorry, guys. Go back to the drawing board. Better yet, pay your engineers like you pay your stylists (and fire the stylists).