gross polluters fee!!!!!

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
katinkid
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:48 pm
Car: 03' 350zr33 red

Post

just doing a quick survey and am going to try and submit something to the state but in a nutshell it will be.

we see all of these muscle cars and such on the road with blowers and completely done engines they dont have to be smogged so there legal.

well those of us with vehicles not meeting current smog regulation. anything on your vehicle not factory "engine mods" are def pissed at current ca smog regulation, right? those state ref tickets suck.

so why not pay a polluters fee, have a gross polluters license?

not only would it help with the so called "emissions problems in CA"but it would also go towards state spending upgrading facilities, research, tax things like that.

who would be for that. idk about you but they would probly make a lot more money doing this for everyone, and i think everyone would be willing to pay to make their car street legal...

everyone wins who is up for it?


User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

umm... naw ill pass

katinkid
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:48 pm
Car: 03' 350zr33 red

Post

so you rather get pulled over by some cop who has no clue what he is doing to give you a state ref ticket... have to completely change your car back to factory which costs $$$$ then pay a $450 ticket fee???

wow some naive people out there.

User avatar
Reno
Posts: 1015
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 4:38 am
Car: 89 S13, boosted.. RAWR..

Post

Maybe he never gotten pulled over , HA!

CA FTL, no no no not you beautiful CA18DET

i mean Cali :P

EfiniRX7
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:37 am
Car: 93 FD3S not going anywhere, 2003 E46 M3 traded, s14 sold, 2010 camaro sold, now another kouki s14, FD did go somewhere, Now a 535whp rotary Kouki s14

Post

I live in Ohio so I don't have your problem, but I think we should be able to do what we want with our own car's. I would never pay for some stupid license to have an engine I payed for in my own car. I also think the last thing CA needs is access to more tax money. I sometimes wish I could spend money like it's going out of style, and get millions more to do the same thing with from the government. I guess I would say no, CA should not tell people what to do with there car's to begin with.


User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

katinkid wrote:so you rather get pulled over by some cop who has no clue what he is doing to give you a state ref ticket... have to completely change your car back to factory which costs $$$$ then pay a $450 ticket fee???

wow some naive people out there.
cali wont get rid of the smog laws. all your "petition" would do it give them more ideas to take your money. see I, dont give a s***, i would never move to cali, im not naive, i just dont care because it doesnt effect me.

Shabbernigdo
Posts: 693
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:36 am

Post

So since we get screwed by the law as tuners and the muscle guys dont you wanna try and change the law to screw them too?

sounds like some hatin to me.

ill pass

Matej
Posts: 1234
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:29 pm

Post

Shabbernigdo wrote:So since we get screwed by the law as tuners and the muscle guys dont you wanna try and change the law to screw them too?

sounds like some hatin to me.

ill pass
Hey brahhh, we don't get screwed, we live in KC.

katinkid
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:48 pm
Car: 03' 350zr33 red

Post

so then why the hell would you reply to a thread if it does not apply to you! thank you for you 2cents.

honestly thats like a discount on canolees going up in new york and me making a big deal saying i hat canolees who gives a f**k

katinkid
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 5:48 pm
Car: 03' 350zr33 red

Post

Shabbernigdo wrote:So since we get screwed by the law as tuners and the muscle guys dont you wanna try and change the law to screw them too?

sounds like some hatin to me.

ill pass
no due to the fact that they already dont get affected they would remain untouched.... only vehicles required for smog would fall under this.

User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

katinkid wrote:
no due to the fact that they already dont get affected they would remain untouched.... only vehicles required for smog would fall under this.
you coulda added that in the first post i think its a good idea now. hey if you want to pay more money to make your car legal, so be it. but it think it would be pointless to try an institute a law that screws over classic car owners

ashibah83
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:35 pm
Car: 93 SUPA BLACK COUPE

Post

heartofaskyline wrote:
but it think it would be pointless to try an institute a law that screws over classic car owners
, not to mention than there are more classic car guys that are better educated, with better knowlegde of laws(being that most hardcore classic guys are 40+ years old) not to mention there cars, and they have better connections than you EVER will, there cars will forever be smog exempt, while yours...uness its a vert, will never be, and the emmissions restrictions will only become more strict

p.s. im glad i live in Georgia......no inspections at all

User avatar
24j0hn
Posts: 696
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:32 am
Car: 91' 240sx with some babying to be given

Post

this subject pisses me of like marijuana laws do

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

You're a retard. Do you actually think CA actually pass something like this? And of all states, California?!? Don't they already have enough pollution currently? There's already plenty of ways to get around the law as it is, stop complaining.

User avatar
OutToWinPAHC
Posts: 8810
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 12:19 pm
Car: 2015 Chevy Silverado
Nissan Skyline R33 GTS-t
Nissan Skyline R32 GTR
Nissan RB20 E46 RHD
2015 Harley Vrod Muscle
1990 Nissan Patrol
Location: PA
Contact:

Post

Federal EPA rules dont require cars 1975 and prior to use emmisions and pollution control. As long as thos older blown cars pass local safety inspections they are legal. In some case they dont even need to pass all of the safety checks. For example my 1968 Nova didn't have seat belts, but it was that way factory so it was not required.

User avatar
shimizu_17
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:21 am

Post

ashibah83 wrote:
, not to mention than there are more classic car guys that are better educated, with better knowlegde of laws(being that most hardcore classic guys are 40+ years old) not to mention there cars, and they have better connections than you EVER will, there cars will forever be smog exempt, while yours...uness its a vert, will never be, and the emmissions restrictions will only become more strict

p.s. im glad i live in Georgia......no inspections at all
Spoken for the truth, California is suppose to be the lead example of emission standards in America, so why would they allow a gross polluter fee? Unless your car is 1975 and below, or you convert your car to a alternative fuel vehicle there is no way around a smog test.

duffman1278
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:09 pm
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, the wildcats!

Post

I see where you're getting at. I mean your idea isn't great but I mean I'll give you credit for trying. Most of us in the import scene just complain about getting tickets and when someone like you actually tries and wants to do something about it they just get crap said to them again.

I say go for it, honestly you're not going to get much support here. Most of us just don't have the time to put the effort into it. One reason why we possibly get more crap from the law for being into imports is because we do nothing about it and most of us can't afford lawyers in court haha.

GL though

User avatar
shimizu_17
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:21 am

Post

duffman1278 wrote:I see where you're getting at. I mean your idea isn't great but I mean I'll give you credit for trying. Most of us in the import scene just complain about getting tickets and when someone like you actually tries and wants to do something about it they just get crap said to them again.

I say go for it, honestly you're not going to get much support here. Most of us just don't have the time to put the effort into it. One reason why we possibly get more crap from the law for being into imports is because we do nothing about it and most of us can't afford lawyers in court haha.

GL though
I agree, its coo that you want to make a change, but try and get a swap kit that can be ref'd or get a big company to make a forced induction kit with Carb numbers.

A dude on zilvia who works at some type of smog thing did a huge thing to try and get SR's legalized, like he had cars with SR's with emission print outs, all the paperwork, etc. But he got shot down by CARB saying you can swap in a sr20de but not a sr20det since it was never offered in america.

User avatar
Mangid
Posts: 127
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:49 pm
Car: 1990 240sx sr20 5-speed

Post

katinkid wrote:just doing a quick survey and am going to try and submit something to the state but in a nutshell it will be.

we see all of these muscle cars and such on the road with blowers and completely done engines they dont have to be smogged so there legal.

well those of us with vehicles not meeting current smog regulation. anything on your vehicle not factory "engine mods" are def pissed at current ca smog regulation, right? those state ref tickets suck.

so why not pay a polluters fee, have a gross polluters license?

not only would it help with the so called "emissions problems in CA"but it would also go towards state spending upgrading facilities, research, tax things like that.

who would be for that. idk about you but they would probly make a lot more money doing this for everyone, and i think everyone would be willing to pay to make their car street legal...

everyone wins who is up for it?
How old are you?

User avatar
SullivanRacing06
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 8:45 am
Car: r32 gtst, 06 350z, r32 gtr, rs4 steaga, 04 350z, f350/6bt
Location: Gainesville

Post

one of the "not so great" obamas ideas is to impose a tax on how many miles you drive you car, while also raising gas taxes another 19c per gallon, thanks to who ever voted 4 him!


freakyjason
Posts: 855
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:54 am
Car: 1990 240sx

Post

SullivanRacing06 wrote:...thanks to who ever voted 4 him!
You're welcome!

duffman1278
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:09 pm
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, the wildcats!

Post

freakyjason wrote:
You're welcome!


And btw the U.S. has the LOWEST gas tax than most countries in the world. So be thankful

hbpignosePA
Posts: 3481
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:07 pm
Car: 90 240sx hatch (Jackstand Queen)
78 Datsun 280Z (RIP)
89 Toyota Cressida (Sold)
86 Nissan 200SX hatch (sold)
83 Nissan 280ZX turbo (parts car)
90 Volvo 240 (sold)
80 Toyota Cressida MX32 (new daily)
Location: Amish Country Pa

Post

good try OP, but it probably wont work

politicians are more keen on looking good to the hippies than the enthusiasts.

this should probably be moved to the politics forum if its gonna go off-course

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

as enthusiasts, we are the minority. the government would never pass something like this. what you need to understand about all these classis muscle cars is that they aren't required to comply with current standards because they were not originally equipped with emissions controls. our cars were, so we have to comply with predetermined standards. if you want to modify your car, you have a couple of options. do it, knowing that your car will not pass smog, and risk getting tickets, impound, etc. or, register it as an off-road vehicle (track only), get a trailer, and tow it to all your track events. i'm not sure about cali, but here in ct, when a car becomes 25 years old, it is exempt from emissions. so i can either have an illegal car, or wait. this is what we have to deal with since we chose to play with modern cars. don't want to deal with it? sell your 240 and buy an old car to tinker with.

User avatar
i240sx
Posts: 1106
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 6:13 pm
Car: 240sx coupe

Post

dont worry...once 1990 under won't have to smog you'll have a sr, rb, ca in your 240...every car has it turn...can't wait mine have another 12-14 more years until its smog free...

User avatar
Dittoz7
Posts: 17694
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 4:08 pm
Car: 1997 2f0WtY SE!
Location: Miami, FL

Post

Sell 240sx.Buy 69' Camaro.

Problem Solved!

User avatar
1unar3clipse
Posts: 1543
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:22 pm
Car: 93 240sx HB, 01 Dodge Dakota SLT

Post

i240sx wrote:dont worry...once 1990 under won't have to smog you'll have a sr, rb, ca in your 240...every car has it turn...can't wait mine have another 12-14 more years until its smog free...
What the hell are you talking about?

your 240 will not be smog exempt unless its a vert limited model thats registered as a collector car.

SR,RB,CA are illegal in California, and Federally.

freakyjason
Posts: 855
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:54 am
Car: 1990 240sx

Post

I'm really glad we don't have to deal with any of this^^ non-sense in NY. I don't know if I would have even gotten a 240 if I lived somewhere with laws like CA.

User avatar
shimizu_17
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:21 am

Post

In certain counties in cali you dont have to smog your car once every 2 years, i know humboldt county you only have to smog a car when your selling a car for the buyer of the car.

So if you move to humboldt or other smog friendly counties problem solved for the most part haha.

duffman1278
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:09 pm
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, the wildcats!

Post

i240sx wrote:dont worry...once 1990 under won't have to smog you'll have a sr, rb, ca in your 240...every car has it turn...can't wait mine have another 12-14 more years until its smog free...
That's wrong. There's a big misconception that 30+ year old cars are exempt. Its ONLY for cars that were made in 1975 and/or OLDER that are exempt from this law. Go read California's state laws and you'll see. The years continue.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”