Interesting, I spent 5 minutes.Jesda wrote:I could spend hours reading.
INTERESTING I BANGED YOUR MOMRCA wrote:
Interesting, I spent 5 minutes.
I never understood it either. People run lights not because they want to plow through and risk death, people usually run them because they aren't paying attention. If they aren't paying attention to a bright red light, they likely won't notice a sign that says "PHOTO ENFORCED".PoorManQ45 wrote:So, I never understood how some people would think that putting a camera up would help to avoid accidents.
The cameras are just like the police that come to the scene, they can only record what happened.
That one really got to me. It only takes a couple meatheads with badges to make all the other good cops look like jerks.zerepdivad wrote:Pretty messed up stuff on the site. Like the meter maid getting arrested for giving a cop a ticket for illegally parking his minivan.
I agree. But the problem is the cameras only get put up at the busiest intersections...that is, the ones most likely to generate lots of revenue. I did some informal research about red light camera locations in a local municipality and there were none at intersections that showed up as some of the country's most dangerous intersections. But they were looking into a stretch of road that was known to be very busy.AZhitman wrote:(From a former accident investigator's standpoint...)
I support red light cameras (if only to determine who was indeed at fault in the event of an accident, and to ensure fair accountability)...
I do NOT support speed cameras of any type, for a multitude of reasons.
Also five minutes worth.Jesda wrote:INTERESTING I BANGED YOUR MOM
BEST 30 SECONDS OF MY LIFEDattebayo wrote:
Also five minutes worth.
CORRECT.Alfador wrote:Honestly I think the biggest problem with any ticketing, especially red light cameras, is that they treat it like a revenue stream instead of an actual deterrence measure anyway.