Was the gal that hit you hotter than your girlfriend?k@osx71 wrote:So, Fri. night, I'm in L.A., just picked up my girl to grab some dinner. About to make a right turn from an open right lane, when some girl on the lane next to me decides to make a right turn. She just turns right into me while I'm still moving. I braked and honked but too late.... She already hit me.... I check the damage, my driver side fender bent in and scratched, and there's a whole lot of scratches and cosmetic damage to my bumper... The bigger *itch to this is, that girl has no insurance nor did she have a license!!!! I thought of calling the cops, but all they'll do is issue a ticket for driving without a license and insurance. I'm going to a dealer recommended Auto Collision Center to get a quote. That girl said she'll pay, got all her info. (whatever I can) made sure the cellphone # she gave was the phone she had in her hands. So yea.... I was pissed....and just thought I might share it with the people who can relate.
^^ Dude, just because Telcoman made an obvious joke about the hotness of the girl doesn't give you the rights to bash him as if you are his mentor.gday wrote:^^ Dude, just because a GIRL is hot as hell doesn't give her the rights you crash into your car.
I bet your're the type of guy that would let it slide if she was hot... You'll probably pull over, and say damn this is my lucky day. She let her go. Then you come here and post all about it and lie that she blew you... haha. loser.
Anyways, go thru your insurance if you have uninsured motorist, and your premium will not go up. Going through the person who hit your directly will take way too long.. She can't even pay for her own insurance so think about it.
Sorry my little joke raised a few feathers As long as she is willing to pay for the damage why go thru the insurance company.k@osx71 wrote:Well as goes for insurance, once I get a quote, I'm planning to speak to my insurance company and most likely have them go after the person who hit me. She said the reason she didn't have insurance at that time was she recently just cancelled her insurance, and she showed me the proof of insurance that she had. And to answer telcoman, NO! she was FUGLY, ahah
Wow that is racist! Didn't you see he said he didn't get a BJ?g35cuhlean wrote:One quick question! Was this girl Mexican? ahaha i dont hate, i just noticed a lot of Mexicans dont have insurance in Cali.
Not really. First off, unless there is an injury or cars stuck in the road, police here rarely show up. I heard at least once a week from people who said they waited after calling the police, but the police fail to show up. In most cases though, police just tell confirm no injuries and no need to have a car towed and they would then tell them to exchange info and call their insurance companies.Q45tech wrote:Failure to call the Police and have tickets/report written limits the ability of your insurance company to collect............hope your insurance company pays for your oversight? Your action of letting her go places you on the hook.
It not racist if he can back up his comment with statistics. If I lived in Cali, I might look it up...but I really don't care here on the east coast. But this is a slippery slope...be careful guys.Gurslow wrote:
Wow that is racist! Didn't you see he said he didn't get a BJ?
how do you make a cold latina?.............. marry her
(wife is latina don't hate me)
well, to be honest, if the cops show up and see she doesn't have insurance or a license she gets nailed with a bad reputation right away...ESPECIALLY if she's not even a valid driver to begin with. There will at least be paperwork proving she was at the scene and had some type of fault after the ticket/arrest.C-Kwik wrote:
Not really. First off, unless there is an injury or cars stuck in the road, police here rarely show up. I heard at least once a week from people who said they waited after calling the police, but the police fail to show up. In most cases though, police just tell confirm no injuries and no need to have a car towed and they would then tell them to exchange info and call their insurance companies.
Secondly, police reports are considered hearsay evidence. Technically, to validate it, the officer who wrote the report needs to be present in court and each party to the case has to have the right to cross-examine the officer to confirm it's accuracy. And even then, unless the officer was actually there to watch the accident occur, it's not actually witness testimony. The officer is only able to testify to what they observed. Typically, they can only observe the damages, any evidence at the scene (skidmarks, construction, etc. and what the involved parties and witnesses tell him. As a result, a police report is generally not considered strong evidence.
As long as I had handled claims, I hadn't handled any with a lack of a police report that limited my ability to subrogate a claim against the responsible party.
Put your assumptions and speculations aside. Having a police report is not as important as you think. I spent 9 years as a claims adjuster and have handled more that 10,000 claims investigations. I've read thousands of accident reports. What I say comes from real world experience. Frankly, in a lot of cases, not having a police report prevented a party from figuring out some of the questions I might ask and developing a good story. Police reports can be obtained by either party. It's much easier to look credible if you know what the other party is going to say. In most cases, each party has no information on the other parties involved until the report is obtained. Insurance companies have to order them so it takes longer than it would if a party to the accident was to walk into the police station and obtain one. Once they see what the other party says, they can try to create a much more thorough story that contradicts the opposing party's story well.0wn3r wrote:
well, to be honest, if the cops show up and see she doesn't have insurance or a license she gets nailed with a bad reputation right away...ESPECIALLY if she's not even a valid driver to begin with. There will at least be paperwork proving she was at the scene and had some type of fault after the ticket/arrest.
also, having the cops arrive and having them report both sides is best. Most of the time people will be honest right at the scene..in this case, she would have admitted fault and you would have had a witness and/or documentation that this was her claim.
However, not having a witness or paperwork allows them time to develop a story against you.
exactly why I didn't want the cops to cite her. I'd rather have her pay for the damages on my car, rather pay the gov. and NOT my car... my girl told me a patrol car drove by while we were talking, haha.C-Kwik wrote:
If they did come out, she'd have been cited for both violations. that means she has to pay a fine. If she has a low income, that leaves less to pay the damages back with. It's far easier to ignore an insurance company than it is the government.