RCA wrote:"Cloud computing" as an OS, not to sure if this is something I would be interested in but Google hasn't yet disappointed me so we'll see.
Pretty much exactly my thought on the matter. I'm all for playing around with alternative OSs as a geek, but the question in my mind is: what is the benefit for me?
That first video (which dumbs down the concept of the OS to such an extreme point that it ends up barely saying anything at all) answers that pretty well: Nothing.
Chrome OS is not for me. It was not designed for me. It's not intended to benefit me. Chrome OS is for the everyman. The guy who doesn't know Direct3D from RAM. It's designed to be simple and "magic" in its invisibility.And in order to do that, it features a lot of things that are advantageous to the everyman but completely counterproductive for me.
First off, I'm not "that guy" from the video. I don't spend most of my time browsing the web, and my web browser is definitely not the most important program on my computer. I use the web a lot, but it's a tool for me to enhance other tasks more than it is the primary purpose of my PC. That's reason #1 Chrome OS is not for me.
Reason #2 is cloud computing. That idea has never appealed to me. I do not want my data somewhere else, especially not somewhere else accessible by others (even if it is "secure"). I want my data right freaking here. On my PC. On my flash drives and DVDs and CDs and floppy discs (yes, my computer has a 3.5'' floppy drive). The difference between me and Everman is that I KNOW what I want to do with my data. He only knows he has it. So handing it off to Google to deal with is a benefit for him. Not for me. I trust me more than I trust Clouds. I still have 10 year old Diablo character files on floppies and know exactly where they are. I have gamesaves for tons of games, configs for HL multiplayer games. I have old school documents, reports. I have resumes dating back a decade. I don't need cloud computing to help me manage my data, keep it secure or organized or safe.
The presentation style of that first video says a lot about the target user audience of Chrome OS. The guy has a borderline douchebag voice, talks about his computer using Everyman "I don't know how it works; I just know it works" commentary, and points out pretty mundane stupid things that people who actually USE their computers wouldn't need explained.The video contrasts pretty sharply with the hour long Wave video from the Google IO dev conference I watched a few days ago. The Wave video was very technical and highly informative, and it would bore the hell out of Everyman.
Chrome's the Web Surfer's OS. It's designed for people who never (literally, NEVER) require anything more of their computer than opening Firefox or maybe, on the rare occasion, itunes. That's definitely not me. But it's definitely a LOT of people. There are a lot more Everymans than mes out there.
The Big Question in my mind is how Google is going to market/promote/distribute/pitch this product. It's not really competition for Windows. But my understanding is it is based on a Linux kernel, which means it's not natively NTFS-friendly (it can read but not write under that system), which complicates dual-booting and hurts the possibility of pitching Chrome OS as a compliment to Windows rather than an alternative.I'm curious how it'll be marketed. In boxes? Download only? Will it have a pricetag? Will it be easy enough for target Everyman to install and set up?