

YesOriginalWheelman wrote:Is that the Black Gold edition?krash wrote:I don't want to be "that guy", but I really think you should get a Z
Yea I didn't want to be that guy either (even though I normally amkrash wrote:I don't want to be "that guy", but I really think you should get a Z




NO! NNNOOOOOOOO!!!!Cefiro4DSC wrote:I've always loved the SVO Mustangs and they're pretty unique looking:




I can get there on the fox body in general, but not the SVO. The SVO will always be special to me, because you don't see very many of them and you can build the hell out of that little 4cyl. A buddy of mine owned one that looked very similar to this one back home:alms24sebring wrote:NO! NNNOOOOOOOO!!!!


jbracy7 wrote:On second thought that bmw 8 series has a v12, I did not know that,but dawm if it ain't pricey
Lots of good info there. As much as I love an 850 and crank my head around when I see one, they aren't all that amazing from the factory. They can be had with a V8 (and thats what I'd buy), but the V12 is stupidly complicated- two mass air sensors, two COMPUTERS, two of everything. All to make 300hp.Bubba1 wrote:jbracy7 wrote:On second thought that bmw 8 series has a v12, I did not know that,but dawm if it ain't pricey
The 8 series Bimmer kinda falls into the same category as a Porsche 928, or Ferrari 308. Sexy exotic cars, that can be acquired dirt cheap. Doesn't mean you should. The 800 lb gorilla problem is that people get easily seduced by them, but end up grabbing their own ankles &taking it in the arse when the euphoria wears off and they realize how insanely expensive they are to repair. Then when (not if) one throws in the towel and try to sell it, if those expensive repairs don;t get done to make them roadworthy, no one will give you anything for it. Unless you can wrench BMW's, I'd advise against owning big Bimmers.
As far as driving the 850i. They are comfortable and the V12 is smooth and torquey, but that V12 is not as peppy as you would expect for such a sleek looking car, and it
s fairly thirsty when it comes to gas. It's more of a weekend cruiser than canyon carver. And should not be considered for DD duty. And yes, I've driven one. A better car to drive than to own.
+2 on not restoring a fox body. It's not that they suck. They have a big following, but there are so simply too many of them, combined with they were built cheaply, means you'll never recoup your investment. Easier to buy a fixed up one for less than cost of the restoration than to do it yourself. then you simply take it to a cruise night and win a few trophies as people love 'em.300ZXttZMAN wrote: +1 on not restoring a foxbody




I think you're on the right track, but I'd go older, like 1980-83 SR-5 Liftback. The older ones were so much nicer looking than the AE86. They were also roomy, built well, 35mpg, RWD, handled great, cheap to repair/maintain, and ridulously reliable. Parts are still easy to get. I owned one for many years and would have kept it had it been equipped with A/C. It was an option back then.themadscientist wrote:Sure, it smells like tofu, but they are fun as hell.

The onlyMonte Carlo's left around in my area have Sunoco official fuel of NASCAR decals covering the bad spots in the bumper, leaky mufflers, a decal in the back window of the little boy peeing on the 24, confederate flag front license plate, trunk lid mounted CB antenna, and yosemite Sam chrome mudflaps.Mr1der wrote:I think we all know the answer.
Monte Carlo Luxury Sport.
The body lines are slightly subdued in comparison to the SS. and I dig the one piece headlights.
also, Denzel had one with hydros. Not the Luxury Sport...but still.
Coupe DeVille > Sedan DeVille.Bubba1 wrote:Hey Jesda, since you like Caddy's, how about a mid 80's sedan de ville? they're not particularly collectible but you can still find pristine garage queens dirt cheap at retirement communities. Heck, my father-in-law literally gave his away, and it was uber clean.