^^This and your thread title are a little much. You'll find I slightly edited your title. The content/topic of the thread is fine, but tone down the wording in the future.telcoman wrote:the loons that peddle total BS to the declining number of republican voters.
You start this topic with insults and expect a legitimate response?telcoman wrote:I find it hard to believe that there are still people that actually listen and believe Beck, O'Reilly, Savage, Limbaugh, & Ingram and the rest of the loons that peddle total BS to the declining number of republican voters.
^^Note to you. If I've already called someone out on something, you don't need to.hsckris wrote:You start this topic with insults and expect a legitimate response?
You are ridiculous.
My bad.HashiriyaS14 wrote:Note to you. If I've already called someone out on something, you don't need to.
For one thing it is an MSNBC video. IMO a horribly bias source, and not only that, but it was Olbermann.Hash wrote:Did anyone actually watch this video yet? I can't stream stuff at work, so I haven't been able to. Anyone want to summarize precisely what the lie was and how he got caught?
Hello BudCold_Zero wrote:Howie,I am sure that Glenn Beck is a big boy and can handle any scrutiny from "The View." I would bet that the drama presented by Beck was just an attempt to garner sympathy and boost his ratings. *shrug*
But I do take issue with your perception that no one is listening to Hannity, Savage, Beck and et al. To be honest, Conservative (namely Political) talk radio shows have far higher rating and advertisement dollars than that of Liberal (far and left of center) talk radio shows. Last time I checked Clear Channel, Talk Radio Network and Citadel Media were not filing bankruptcy, unlike Air America (who got bought out) and to be honest... Print Media follows the same paradigm.
I find it ironic that left of center and (probably further) left News Papers are complaining that their advertisements are down and their readerships are down. Yet a right of center, Wall Street Journal doesn't appear to be complaining of the same thing. I guess the final moniker of 'Success' will be weather or not you take Federal Bail Out Money and are propped up by the Federal Government when they start taking on that industry. Which I am sure to liberals is a badge of honor and the very definition of 'SUCK-cess.'
What I do find ironic is that these 'Conservative' Political Talk show Hosts at the outset of the 2008 Presidential Campaign all started referring to themselves as 'Independent Conservatives.' Apparently, trying to distance themselves from the GOP. I do find it a bunch of BUNK when guys like Hannity, Rush and Levin (to name only a few) do this. They have been and always will be in lock step with the Republican Party. Now guys like Michael Savage are the exception. As far back as I have been listening to him, he has always ranted against what GW Bush has done to the Conservative movement with his 'Language, Borders, Culture. STUPID!' motto.
I guess the Savage Nation is to me, what Sirius 101 Howard Stern channel is to you! *grin*
Since you brought up Stern, he had ex GOV Jessie Ventura a few days ago. During a discussion of torture (he is a former Navy Seal) Jessie stated that "given a waterboard, one hour, and d!ck Cheney, he would have him confessing to the Sharon Tate murders"Very interesting interview.Cold_Zero wrote:I guess the Savage Nation is to me, what Sirius 101 Howard Stern channel is to you! *grin*
That may be true in rural America but it is clear the numbers on the right are declining. The Republican party continues to show a lack of leadership and any alternatives to the direction President Obama is leading the country.Cold_Zero wrote:
But I do take issue with your perception that no one is listening to Hannity, Savage, Beck and et al. To be honest, Conservative (namely Political) talk radio shows have far higher rating and advertisement dollars than that of Liberal (far and left of center) talk radio shows. Last time I checked Clear Channel, Talk Radio Network and Citadel Media were not filing bankruptcy, unlike Air America (who got bought out) and to be honest... Print Media follows the same paradigm.
MY thing is... how can a media source take federal money, they are bias no matter what they say.... if the GOVT bails out someone with federal views that can sway voters, is that abuse of power? can the GOVT keep the opions they want alive and those they don't like, let them die.... i can't stand what the GOVT is doing with the FREE market and how they are trying to control what we buy, see and who is worthy of BAILOUT money... and yes i know it started with BushCold_Zero wrote:Howie,
I find it ironic that left of center and (probably further) left News Papers are complaining that their advertisements are down and their readerships are down. Yet a right of center, Wall Street Journal doesn't appear to be complaining of the same thing. I guess the final moniker of 'Success' will be weather or not you take Federal Bail Out Money and are propped up by the Federal Government when they start taking on that industry. Which I am sure to liberals is a badge of honor and the very definition of 'SUCK-cess.'
1) Beck isn't a reporter, nor does he pretend to be. Hence why his show is called "Glenn Beck" and not "Fox News." He is no more or less a reporter than Olbermann or any of the other pundits on the left.... they are all playing the same game, just on different sides of the ball.telcoman wrote:In fact if you watch the MSNBC video Beck admits that he is not an investigative reporter, nor a regular reporter but claims he is a commentator that does not check his so called facts.
She needs to go back to doing Star Trek.themadscientist wrote:Whoopie needs a punch in the mouth. So annoying.
Libertarian is pretty much a buzzword these days.Mile High Versa wrote:Just to make it clear, Glenn Beck is Libertarian and he even said so.
Old farts like old formats.Cold_Zero wrote:To be honest, Conservative (namely Political) talk radio shows have far higher rating... Print Media follows the same paradigm.
I didn't want to see Bud end up like d!ck CheneyRepo Man wrote:Howard, your comments toward Bud not shooting anyone are as asinine as they are ignorant and irresponsible. Nice work.
Hehe, I enjoy it more and more every time Biden and Gibbs open their mouths.telcoman wrote:You should just lay back and enjoy the democratic ride.
It looks as though it is going to be a long one
Telcoman
He removed it.Kohster wrote:how come it says "last post by Cold Zero" but I cant find his post?
You can delete your own posts too.telcoman wrote:He removed it.
Bud is a super moderator and he can do things that we mere mortals cannot
And conservatives too.telcoman wrote:He can even ban all the liberals if he wanted to
At least 98% of the time, quotes are taken out of context. One should always read before and after a selected quote to get an understanding of where the quote came from in the first place. This is a huge, huge problem in journalism and the battle for ratings/money. Mainstream journalism is barely acceptable journalism.Kohster wrote:eh, I don't know how anyone can listen to a "commentator" like Michael Savage who believes autism is for the most part non-existent and that muslims "need deportation", and that adherents of Islam would do well to “take [their] religion and shove it up [their] behind” because he says he's sick of them.
He also said the female students from a Marin County private school who feed and provide services to the homeless "can go in and get raped by them because they seem to like the excitement of it..."
I'd like to meet the people who take this clown seriously.
See - there's your problem! You were supposed to find "right wing" not "wind-bag pseudo conservative"telcoman wrote:I believe it was you that urged me during the presidential campaign to listen to some right wing programs>
Well i put a season pass on my TIVO for OReilly and I sometimes can't believe the items that concern him.
Is that an accusation or an insinuation?telcoman wrote:Bud is a super moderator and he can do things that we mere mortals cannot
He can even ban all the liberals if he wanted to