So the RWD, almost 300hp FLAGSHIP should not tow anything? Sounds like Infiniti had a sorry weak point. I see Taurus's, Camry's, and all other sorts of vehicles with hitches/in-tow, and the Q can't hang?Q45tech wrote:We don't usually recommend towing anything even a motorcyle due to the potential damage to transmission and rear subframe and the associated $4,000 replacement cost of these two items.
You don't put a thoroughbred into a mule's harness.jltibbs wrote:
So the RWD, almost 300hp FLAGSHIP should not tow anything? Sounds like Infiniti had a sorry weak point. I see Taurus's, Camry's, and all other sorts of vehicles with hitches/in-tow, and the Q can't hang?
I don't understand.
Drivetrain layout and power have nothing to do with towing. That's why 4-banger Frontiers have higher towing capacities than V8 sedans.Tauruses and Camrys should not be used for towing any more than the Q. For one thing, the automatic transmissions in these cars are NOT up to the load. You'll ruin them in a hurry. Especially if you allow the car to use overdrive.The other weakness is frame construction. The unibodies of these cars are not designed with towing stresses in mind. Nor are the subframes. Trucks have monstrously beefy ladder frames. The Q and Camry and Taurus have a wussy subframe bolted to a unibody.jltibbs wrote:So the RWD, almost 300hp FLAGSHIP should not tow anything? Sounds like Infiniti had a sorry weak point. I see Taurus's, Camry's, and all other sorts of vehicles with hitches/in-tow, and the Q can't hang?
I don't understand.
Not comparable. Trailer weight is focused on certain points of the frame. Starting and stopping is especially stressful. The stresses from towing are vastly greater than the stresses of hauling passengers.Skibane wrote:Eh, depends on what you're towing...
Three 200-pound passengers + 200-pound driver + 200 pounds luggage = 1000 pounds rolling weight, 1000 pounds on the axles
200-pound driver + 800 pound trailer = 1000 pounds rolling weight, but only 300 pounds on the axles (assuming 100 pound tongue weight)
Thanks MoD, that's what I was looking for, an answer. Not a brief description and a value if you damage something. Now everyone who is curious will know why not to tow.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Drivetrain layout and power have nothing to do with towing. That's why 4-banger Frontiers have higher towing capacities than V8 sedans.Tauruses and Camrys should not be used for towing any more than the Q. For one thing, the automatic transmissions in these cars are NOT up to the load. You'll ruin them in a hurry. Especially if you allow the car to use overdrive.The other weakness is frame construction. The unibodies of these cars are not designed with towing stresses in mind. Nor are the subframes. Trucks have monstrously beefy ladder frames. The Q and Camry and Taurus have a wussy subframe bolted to a unibody.
It's the same reason the Pathfinder has a 7000lb towing capacity while a Honda Pilot (which makes similar power) is only rated for a max of 4500.
When my 94 Q45t broke... I used my 91 Honda Accord 4-cyl/2.2L to tow it. RPMs kept low, twice the boot and power still under my foot, that baby can tow!Q45tech wrote:We don't usually recommend towing anything even a motorcyle due to the potential damage to transmission and rear subframe and the associated $4,000 replacement cost of these two items.
The stresses are indeed different, but don't necessarily favor hauling passengers. Trailers tend to have their own brakes (electric or hydraulic surge) - Passengers don't.MinisterofDOOM wrote:
Not comparable. Trailer weight is focused on certain points of the frame. Starting and stopping is especially stressful. The stresses from towing are vastly greater than the stresses of hauling passengers.
Maybe I should turn in my license.Q45tech wrote:Unfortunately the US doesn't require that potential buyers of vehicles have a 3.8 GPA and BSME. I've always thought they should but alas we even allow BA and non HS grads to buy a car.
Think about that the next time you are in traffic, I do all the time!
Not saying you in particular should, but I would say 50% are unqualified to drive a two ton vehicle at highway speeds.jltibbs wrote:
Maybe I should turn in my license.
Butt he point is, passengers primarily create changes in vertical force vector for which the bushings were designed, while trailers increase force vectors in the horizontal planes for which they are only minimally designed.Skibane wrote:Eh, depends on what you're towing...
Three 200-pound passengers + 200-pound driver + 200 pounds luggage = 1000 pounds rolling weight, 1000 pounds on the axles
200-pound driver + 800 pound trailer = 1000 pounds rolling weight, but only 300 pounds on the axles (assuming 100 pound tongue weight)
See, that's where, to me, book smarts is ok, but in all reality common sense should have kicked in. Who cares what your hydroplane speed is? Slow down in inclement weather. Plain and simpleQ45tech wrote:How many drivers understand their wet coefficient of friction varies directly with their tire inflation PSI? DUH. How many can instantly calculate the critical hydroplane speed?
See, the plain and simple problem is if you can't calculate your hydroplane speed or feel it in your tires, then what is that safe speed?jltibbs wrote:See, that's where, to me, book smarts is ok, but in all reality common sense should have kicked in. Who cares what your hydroplane speed is? Slow down in inclement weather. Plain and simple
I think that old people like you and Brian should have to take driver's tests since your cognitions are impaired, reflexes are slow and your "paranoia" increases susceptibility to road rage.Q45tech wrote:How many drivers understand their wet coefficient of friction varies directly with their tire inflation PSI? DUH. How many can instantly calculate the critical hydroplane speed?
A black Crown Vic Interceptor was teh car I originally wanted. They are cheap to maintain (comparatively) and people drive more cautious around you. I test drove 6 of them which had holes all in the top from the sirens, had no back seat and the one's that did were plastic and seemed to be poorly maintained. If your son picked up one that hasn't been too "beat-on" he made out pretty good in my mind.....those are surprisingly hard to find in good condition.Q45tech wrote:My son drives a State Crown Vic [30-35k per year] with police package and an elected offical in the rear. He has nightmares about the typical car on the road. Unfortunately they are stuck with what they drive/ride in.
All our rowdy neighbors have calmed down since the black CV spends time in the driveway. All those antenna and lights..........a blip of the siren, windows open with 2 way blaring every once and awhile.
Remember this asinine when you are where we are!bullittandy wrote:
I think that old people like you and Brian should have to take driver's tests since your cognitions are impaired, reflexes are slow and your "paranoia" increases susceptibility to road rage.