I don't wanna see hetero's smakin and making out in public either.Gabes13 wrote:Heterosexuals do that s*** all the time! what's the big deal?infiniti_lineup wrote: Anyways, I don't mind gay male couples AS LONG AS they keep it out of my face. Just like we should stay out of their personal business, I don't want to have them smooching in front of me (and a lot of them DO in public).
heliochrome85 wrote:you're a whiz with photoshop. i think this thread could only be improved with some of your work...

Again, by the very definition of sexuality, just because he's wearing "womans" clothes doesn't mean he's a homosexualaudtatious wrote:heliochrome85 wrote:you're a whiz with photoshop. i think this thread could only be improved with some of your work...
Gabes13 wrote: Again, by the very definition of sexuality, just because he's wearing "womans" clothes doesn't mean he's a homosexual
That's a threatening statement that promotes a sense of unease. You dont have a problem with it until it affects you individually, and affects meaning "touches" you. Men hit on woman all the time, and most woman don't appreciate it but it doesn't mean their going to relinquish their sexuality. your statement makes it sound like homosexuals are automatically attracted to all men and have to pursue sexual relations with every men they encounter, and when one encounters you, you disagreeinfiniti_lineup wrote: as long as he kept his hands to himself.
I am a homosexual, and I find many things in this thread, and forum, to be offensive and degrading to my orientation, but I'm trying to present a perspective that is finite in society and even smaller on this board.infiniti_lineup wrote:And since we're assuming things like wildfire, I'll assume that you are a homosexual by the attacking and disputatious nature of your posts.Gabes13 wrote: and just because youre a male (Im assuming you are)
Yeah...so you were told. That's a good one.Eikon wrote: (or so I'm told)
Show me a minority that doesnt play the victim card. And in some respects they are entitled to play that card. The victim card still has a much bigger balance left on it than the race card. That one's about int the Insufficient Funds area.infiniti_lineup wrote:They, and their supporters, like to play the constant "victim" card.
IBCoupe wrote:Choade?
stebo0728 wrote:Show me a minority that doesnt play the victim card. And in some respects they are entitled to play that card. The victim card still has a much bigger balance left on it than the race card. That one's about int the Insufficient Funds area.infiniti_lineup wrote:They, and their supporters, like to play the constant "victim" card.
Gabes13 wrote:My dear friend, I take everything said to me with a grain of salt. Trust me, I'm NOT crying my little eyes out while i post in this thread. My posts are simply my opinions on a matter that greatly affects me as an individual. I might have met maybe 1 or 2 people on this board and could care less what anybody here says about me, but the attitudes that are displayed here are not exclusive to the forums only. No, there are millions of people that think this way and absolutely believe theres nothing wrong. If theres a chance that I can promote change, then I'll take that chance.
lol - you should refrain from making arguments like this, they tend to lead belief toward the contraryheliochrome85 wrote:while ive never met this guy, hes got my support. not cause he is gay. cause he is right.
stebo0728 wrote:lol - you should refrain from making arguments like this, they tend to lead belief toward the contraryheliochrome85 wrote:while ive never met this guy, hes got my support. not cause he is gay. cause he is right.
At least it's sunny hahahainfiniti_lineup wrote:
also known as "hung like a can of tuna" syndromeIBCoupe wrote:Choade?
