Post by
elbles »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/elbles-u3033.html
Tue Jun 29, 2004 8:32 am
Chingon: Yeah, that should be right. There are more BTU's in lower octane gas, so in an engine not designed for it, it will offer the same (if not better) performance, along with higher fuel economy. In such an instance, the lower octane fuel works with the lower compression engine to yield the most efficent combination. In a higher compression engine, a higher octane fuel is necessary not only to resist knock, but also to yield maximum efficiency; due to the engine's higher compression, more energy can be extracted from each firing, which can certainly help negate the fact that less energy is present in each molecule of a higher octane fuel, usually to the point where equivelent high compression/low compression engines will acheive the same MPG running the appropriate high or low octane fuels.
MOE101: I know the KA24E is a lower compression engine, and 87 is all it needs. For the DE, I think the compression is slightly higher (could easily be wrong there though, heh), though I doubt it was to the point where a higher octane fuel would be necessary. Hope that helps . . .