ok. i've read daemos' thread and quite a few others already, but i would like to know some specific things:
let's compare similar turbine housings on very different units:
GT25/40R (450HP)
Turbine-Wheel: 53mm w/ 62 trim-Housing: .64 ar, .86 ar
Compressor-Wheel: 60mm w/ 60 trim-Housing: .70 ar
GT28RS (350HP)
Turbine-Wheel: 53.85mm w/ 76 trim-Housing: .64 or .86 ar-Maps
Compressor-Wheel: 60mm w/ 62 trim-Housing: .60 ar
now i'm confused at to why these turbos are rated so differently. it cannot be the compressor housing alone that creates '100' more HP.
i read that TRIM is an area ratio used to describe both turbine and compressor wheels. Trim is calculated using the inducer and exducer diameters. As trim is increased, the wheel can support more air/gas flow.
BUT i don't understand how it is calculated. the GT2540R is a 60 trim and the GT28RS is a 76 trim compressor wheel. and by the statement above, wouldn't the GT28RS flow more than the GT2540R?
this is where i get super confused. for the compressor and the turbine you have 3 specs; wheel size, trim, and housing A/R. it doesn't make any sense to me what spools better, makes more HP, saves low-end torque, etc.
then there's compressor maps, which i learned to read and analyse from
http://www.turbomustangs.com/turbotech/main.htm#ar
and from doing their basic calculations and using the compressor maps on that site, based on a 1.8L 8000RPM redline i'd have a PR of 1.37 (approximation) @10psi, i'd choose a T04E 54 trim because it hits 74-76% efficiency at 4000RPM, at 6000RPM it's at 76-78%, and at 8000RPM it only falls off to 72-74%. unless, that is, i'm wrong about the PR.
but that info still leaves me hanging about why trims, housing A/Rs and compressor/turbine matchings are the way that they are.
I could just ask which is better? GT28RS or GT2540R or whatever, but i'd like to know HOW AND WHY!
thanks for any input guys.