Game on - Missiles go to Poland.

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
rn79870
Posts: 4807
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 2008 G35 & 2005 Vette C6 vert.

Post

We recently had a thread looking at Russia's position that using nuke weapons would be a legal option for a country that hosted defensive missiles for use against Russia.

A logical person might think twice about biting the sleeping bear in the butt. However, that isn't a concern for our current administration. Is this heading us into another cold war?

US and Poland sign missile deal Kaczynski said the signing was an important day in Poland's history [File: AFP] Washington and Warsaw have signed a deal to deploy US interceptor missiles in Poland, despite Russian opposition to the move.

Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, and Radoslaw, her Polish counterpart, signed the accord at a ceremony in the capital, on Wednesday.

The signing comes six days after the two countries agreed to a deal that will allow 10 of the missiles to be placed just 180km from Russia's westernmost frontier.

"The negotiations were very tough but friendly," Donald Tusk, Poland's prime minister, said.

"We have achieved our main goals, which means that our country and the United States will be more secure."

'New threats'

Rice told reporters: "This is an agreement that will establish a missile defence site here in Poland that will help us to deal with the new threats of the 21st century, of long range missiles ... from countries like Iran or North Korea." Russia sees the placing of the missiles in parts of central Europe as a threat to its security.

It says Washington and Warsaw rushed into finalising the deal as a response to its military action in Georgia.

Some Russian politicians and generals have said Poland must be prepared for a preventive attack on the site in the future.

Nato on Tuesday denounced threats against alliance member Poland as "unacceptable". It endorsed the missile plan for Europe at its summit in Bucharest in April even though some allies are sceptical about its effectiveness and concerned it could lead to a new arms race. The deal must now be approved by the Polish parliament, which is seen as a formality. Tusk's government demanded greater military co-operation with the US for agreeing to host the site.

Maybe it's a good thing we're retiring the cowboy in January. He just seems to be in the middle of every squabble, regardless of the countries squabbling. (Couldn't we reserve sending the missiles to Poland until and unless there were hostilities?)

Let's assume Russia made good on it's threat and used a nuclear missile, what then WWIII? Is it worth a risk?


User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Or maybe it's a good thing we have a cowboy in office who won't bow to every empty threat a foreign power makes. A show of strength can go farther than actual strength sometimes.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

Poland has a right to determine its own path and if they decide this is what they want to do then Russia can bite a d!ck. We need this kid to go to Russia and explain our position.

User avatar
rn79870
Posts: 4807
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 2008 G35 & 2005 Vette C6 vert.

Post

It's a good move on the republicans part. Why not stir the pot so McWar looks like the old soldier with service to give instead of fading away like he should. Besides, why does Poland need our missiles again?


User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Deterrent. Peace through strength. No one wants to get in a fist fight with the Rock. Rip Taylor however...

User avatar
Soravia
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 5:45 pm
Car: 2003 Audi A4 1.8T

Post

So that it can stop being a ***** to Russia.

You liberals keep saying MISSILE! MISSILE! MISSILE!

That's Missile Interceptor System. It could be ANYTHING. Right now it's just the old Patriot system that shot down Saddam's Scuds in first Gulf war.http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/...ROrgF

The system has its better parts in radar bases and satellite system. Which could also alert a lot more than nuke missiles in the sky. Russians will have a hard time invading the Eastern EU with defense system like that.

User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

Seeing is that the bulk of the anti Ballistic Defence of this country is centered around using Missiles to shoot down Ballistic Missiles, I think it is forgivable for people to use the term missile. Seeing is that the RIM-161 is a Standard Missile 3, the MIM-104F and THAAD are all Surface to Air Missiles.bud

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

You're wasting your time.

The left wil see only what they want to see, ignoring the fact that this has already gone through multiple levels of scrutiny, and smarter people than us have deemed it appropriate.

Second-guess all you want, but the logic is there. I don't trust the former Soviets any more than I trust KJI.

User avatar
Cold_Zero
Posts: 6714
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 4:15 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan Altima SE 3.5
2005 Nissan Pathfinder

Post

Soravia wrote:Russians will have a hard time invading the Eastern EU with defense system like that.
With or without this Missile Defence Shield, we already know if the Russian Federation forces are on the move. Trust me with the ELINT, HUMINT and GEOINT that we, I dont think the Russians can take a dump with out someone in Langley, Bethesda or Ft Meade being tipped off to it.bud

User avatar
srellim234
Posts: 2710
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:12 am
Car: 2007 Nissan Versa SL hatch w/CVT
(sold 08/2011)
2008 Toyota Prius
(purchased 04/2016)
Location: Laughlin, NV

Post

AZhitman wrote:You're wasting your time.

The left wil see only what they want to see, ignoring the fact that this has already gone through multiple levels of scrutiny, and smarter people than us have deemed it appropriate.

Second-guess all you want, but the logic is there. I don't trust the former Soviets any more than I trust KJI.
Would those smarter people include those who concluded that tractor trailer rigs making hydrogen for balloons were mobile WMD labs?

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

They might, especially given that the rigs were being moved in close coincidence to the satellite flyovers.

But here - You review the evidence available at the tmie, and let's see what YOU would have concluded:

http://www.globalsecurity.org/...3.htm

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 25014
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

I would have thought Bob would support this as Poland wants the system that we have and the last thing we want is Poland to be mad at us too....

User avatar
rn79870
Posts: 4807
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 2008 G35 & 2005 Vette C6 vert.

Post

Bob sees it as needless provocation of Russia. More of the GW/McWar mentality. Like someone building a McDonald's in your front yard just becasue they know you won't like it.

User avatar
Soravia
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 5:45 pm
Car: 2003 Audi A4 1.8T

Post

Don't blame Bush for the Iraq war. Saddam himself wanted to play N. Korea to get some slack. But the thing is, He didn't have real weapons to defend himself.

Acting AS IF he had real WMDs, Saddam had it coming.He could have said, I don't have them anymore, remove some of the sanctions and I'll let the inspectors in. US still can't invade Iraq no matter how many people he kills.

As for Russia, the whole thing is in plain sight when Putin came to power and never stepped down.

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 25014
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

rn79870 wrote:Bob sees it as needless provocation of Russia. More of the GW/McWar mentality. Like someone building a McDonald's in your front yard just becasue they know you won't like it.
If we don't sell it to them they may dislike us. That seems to be one of your main concerns with the world.


Return to “Politics Etc.”