Post by
rn79870 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/rn79870-u82084.html
Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:13 am
We recently had a thread looking at Russia's position that using nuke weapons would be a legal option for a country that hosted defensive missiles for use against Russia.
A logical person might think twice about biting the sleeping bear in the butt. However, that isn't a concern for our current administration. Is this heading us into another cold war?
US and Poland sign missile deal Kaczynski said the signing was an important day in Poland's history [File: AFP] Washington and Warsaw have signed a deal to deploy US interceptor missiles in Poland, despite Russian opposition to the move.
Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, and Radoslaw, her Polish counterpart, signed the accord at a ceremony in the capital, on Wednesday.
The signing comes six days after the two countries agreed to a deal that will allow 10 of the missiles to be placed just 180km from Russia's westernmost frontier.
"The negotiations were very tough but friendly," Donald Tusk, Poland's prime minister, said.
"We have achieved our main goals, which means that our country and the United States will be more secure."
'New threats'
Rice told reporters: "This is an agreement that will establish a missile defence site here in Poland that will help us to deal with the new threats of the 21st century, of long range missiles ... from countries like Iran or North Korea." Russia sees the placing of the missiles in parts of central Europe as a threat to its security.
It says Washington and Warsaw rushed into finalising the deal as a response to its military action in Georgia.
Some Russian politicians and generals have said Poland must be prepared for a preventive attack on the site in the future.
Nato on Tuesday denounced threats against alliance member Poland as "unacceptable". It endorsed the missile plan for Europe at its summit in Bucharest in April even though some allies are sceptical about its effectiveness and concerned it could lead to a new arms race. The deal must now be approved by the Polish parliament, which is seen as a formality. Tusk's government demanded greater military co-operation with the US for agreeing to host the site.
Maybe it's a good thing we're retiring the cowboy in January. He just seems to be in the middle of every squabble, regardless of the countries squabbling. (Couldn't we reserve sending the missiles to Poland until and unless there were hostilities?)
Let's assume Russia made good on it's threat and used a nuclear missile, what then WWIII? Is it worth a risk?