dkrep wrote:like i have said earlier about the sts rear mount turbo is that the is little to no lag lost but you have to buy a seperate oil pump. there is a guy that i talked to this weekend who is the first guy to put one of these on a corvette hence the 652 twin setup that i got to see and hear. sick. anyways they run a smaller charge pipe and they also have to use a stock exhaust to run the waste gate unless you run a twins setup. the guy that i talked to said that it would cost around 13k to run a twin setup if a kit was not available. which it is so that number is invalid. also they like to run the charge pipes in the rocker panels and put the intake under the rear bumper behind the tails. you essentially have one big intake pipe from the intercooler supplied by the charge pipe that run to your intake manifold. there is also things that are envolved with that. bigger injectors and one step colder plugs. also he recomends to run a water meth injection system with that to run safe boost. 6 with out meth and 10psi with meth. hope this will help somepeople wtih the rear mounted turbos.
Well I'll admit that I don't know much about that particular system. But I cannot see how, with all that plumbing, this system could have little or no turbo lag? Could you please elaborate?I mean with that length of charge pipes, the volume must be huge. Unless of course they run very very thin charge pipes in which case you would have a big problem not only with pressure loss, but also with maximum flow capability.
On top of that, by mounting the turbos so far back you will also get turbo lag because you have a huge volume of exhaust pipe to fill before you ever get to the turbines.Again, unless you have very thin pipes but then again you run into pressure-loss and flow issues.
Of course, having a smaller turbo will reduce these issues, but then I don't think they could claim any of the numbers they do on their website.
Not trying to be Mr. Negative here. I would just like to understand.