G35 TT .... or SuperCharger

A general discussion forum for G35 and G37 owners and a great place to introduce yourself to the NICOclub G-Series Forums!
kdfja1
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:03 pm

Post

So I'm searching around and most G35's are Supercharged insteaded of TT'ed or even turboed just wondering why the 350z is better TT'ed and the g35 seems to be jipped and havta be supercharged



kmech_7
Posts: 322
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:16 pm
Car: 2003 Infiniti G35 coupe (Skyline) Vortech Supercharged Jul 08 ROTM
Contact:

Post

its the same set-up its just that a naturaly asperated engine like that of the G and 305z is a better platform for the supercharger. If your using an induction engine the turbo is better because it can withstand higher pressure(aka-the Evo 8(20psi boost))

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

A NA motor is not inherently a better platform for supercharging than turbocharging. They share many of the same issues and some differences.

As far as the original topic, the G35 does not have to be supercharged. There are only minor difference between kits designed for the G35 and for the 350Z. Most typically in intercooler design and perhaps placement. Bear in mind there are many aspects of each car that appeals to different drivers. There is a lot of crossover, but it may be the buyers that are more particular to each car that may make the difference in choice. My thoughts are that G35 drivers may be more conscious of their warranties and may opt for the Stillen Kit with a warranty. The Z probably appeals to more buyers that are willing to take more risks. This is of course only speculation. In any case neither motor is more suited to supercharging or turbocharging.


Return to “G35 and G37 General Discussions”