check our 350Z forum for that, much discussion, as the cars are nearly identical.http://nicoclub.com/zeroforum?id=168audtatious wrote:Thanks Fred...
Now I'm researching TT vs. SC so I can determine price vs. performance.
1) true connecting rods and connecting rod bolts2)This is not all that clear yet, a check with Nissan North America, only talks about upgraded valves, springs.At some point I had a source, said teh rods might be a bit upograded too, but I cant find it again, even a little thicker would help and as the rods experince more tensile stress at higher rpm it would make sense w/ this rpm raises engine3) The G35C 6 mt with the 298 hp rating will have the same engine internals as the 350Z Track/Anniv. the other cars in the model range will still have the other internalsaudtatious wrote:1)The weakest link in the motor is the connecting rods, correct, 2)and the track edition has been updated with stronger rods (from what I have heard). 3)If this is true, does the G35c 6mt have the upgraded rods or the weaker ones?
1) reliable but also one of the lower power produceers. you need new hood too, to accomodate, its a roots type so more heat, which is why less boost used = less power.Stage II gets expesnive,m 384 crank hp is a lot f less than the Vortec or Procharger which both make about 400-410 vcrank hp and approx 340-360 whp.A valid choice still...audtatious wrote:
1)Any comments on the Stillen SC? They claim the Stage III at 410 flywheel HP or the Stage II (with 3/36 warranty) to 384....
2)What about SSR? They are claiming "up to around 650hp" on the Z setup.
1) hal was running a VQ30 an engine not as aggressively optimized for stock performance and possesing of shorter rods which equlas extra strenght for above stock power levels.2) ST = slower spool BUT on a 3.5 Liter thats less of an issue, you can also adjust the trbo, so it spools a bit quicker, between the relatively large size (for FI) and good heads of a VQ35, you dont need a lot of boost to get real fast.audtatious wrote:
1)Never can tell about a VQ. Look what Hal has done to his pool 'lil Maxima . The dyno was supposedly done at 6psi. He has added SAFC and e-manage from what I can tell and running mostly at 10psi with some runs upped to 12psi. No dyno on that config yet...
2)I have noted that a lot of TT cars go to single turbo setups for power (like the Supra boyz). Is there any particular reason to utilize a TT setup vs the single? I am assuming the TT setup utilizes smaller turbo's that produce boost quicker than a single "big" turbo setup? Of course, a little shot in the azz with nitrous would solve some of the "slow spool" issues....
Yes there is a sense among some that a ST is safer thaqn a TT for the same reason a centrifugal SC would be safer in some folks opnions.audtatious wrote:So, if the issue was mainly due to the TT setup along with the shielding issue, would that make the larger single-turbo setup more safe? Since I've heard the current setup goes so fast through the first two gears, then a little less off the line with more midrange-highrange boost could make the car quicker after launch, correct?
Still trying to "learn". I appreciate the time you're taking