Full clean photos of the 2012 Camry

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post



User avatar
darens13
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 6:30 pm
Car: '93 240sx, '90 chevy 1500, '49 dodge pickup

Post

another nice, slab-sided, bland car. thanks toyota!

User avatar
Kompresshun
Administrator
Posts: 3633
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 7:41 am
Car: 2020 Nissan Pathfinder SV 4x4, 2017 Ford F150 4x4 SuperCab 3.5L Ecoboost/10AT, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder SE Offroad 5AT
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

I think I actually prefer the current one, but I suppose it's an improvement. I still don't like them though, regardless of how much they try to dress up it's blandness.

The rear end looks like they copied it directly from a Lexus and the front end looks like a Lexus GH and a Corollas love child. In between it looks exactly the same, so in short, it's just as dumb as the previous ones.

User avatar
Loki
Posts: 7653
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:27 am
Car: 1994 Nissan 240SX Convertible
2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Post

The front end reminds me of an old, grouchy mustachioed man. Rear end isn't so bad.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Cleaner than the current generation, but the proportions have devolved still further. It really does look like a giant Corolla.

The tail lights are a mess.

I kind of like the C-pillar. It reminds me of the late-90s model (easily the best-looking Camry). Unfortunately it's flows blandly in to a too-stubby decklid which, also like the late-90s models, angles downward too much.

All that said, I'd say it's probably the 2nd or third nicest looking Camry design simply because it's one of the cleanest. Ignoring those tail lights anyway. But then "nicest looking Camry" isn't exactly a high bar to clear.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

I was gonna post some sort of snarky remark about how boring it is but fell asleep on my keyboard.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Am I the only one seeing that abortion they are calling foglights? WTF is going on there?!

Also looks like quite the negative camber in the rear.

JoeCool6972
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:29 am
Car: 2017 Infiniti QX50
Location: https://youtube.com/@joet_17qx50
Contact:

Post

THAT IS ONE FUGLY CAR! And after the way those a**holes handled the sticking throttle situation I would NEVER own a damn Toyota. :nono:

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

JoeCool6972 wrote:THAT IS ONE FUGLY CAR! And after the way those a**holes handled the sticking throttle situation I would NEVER own a damn Toyota. :nono:

Uh, do you realize it was just announced that Toyota was exonerated for the sticking throttle situation?

As far as styling, we're talking Toyota here, not Pininfarina. For the non-enthusiast Clark W. Griswold type that buy family trucksters, it's not great and not awful. kinda bland, which keeps to their formula.

I don't mind the front end, though the foglights look like a slapped on afterthought. I also don;t mind the profile, but the rear looks as if they ran out of design time and connected a bunch of lines, kinda like a Bangle era BMW.

User avatar
ADDirishboy
Posts: 13079
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:08 am
Car: 2008 Nissan Titan Pro4x
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Contact:

Post

JoeCool6972 wrote:THAT IS ONE FUGLY CAR! And after the way those a**holes handled the sticking throttle situation I would NEVER own a damn Toyota. :nono:
:facepalm:

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I dont blame Toyota for the sticky throttle issue either. That's why I never made a thread on the topic, despite my disdain for the brand.

What was disturbing was how they handled the issue, burying it and hiding it instead of confronting it. They seemed more like 1960s GM than modern day Toyota. That cost them a lot of trust with American consumers who have inexplicably perceived Toyota as the vehicular return of Jesus Christ.

Its why Toyota increased its fleet sales (even prior to the autopocalypse) to make up for falling retail sales. These days, you're almost as likely to get a Camry at the Enterprise counter as you are a Sebring or Impala.
Last edited by Jesda on Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

JoeCool6972
Posts: 154
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:29 am
Car: 2017 Infiniti QX50
Location: https://youtube.com/@joet_17qx50
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:
JoeCool6972 wrote:THAT IS ONE FUGLY CAR! And after the way those a**holes handled the sticking throttle situation I would NEVER own a damn Toyota. :nono:

Uh, do you realize it was just announced that Toyota was exonerated for the sticking throttle situation?
WTF? Are you kidding me? Are you blind? Deaf? Or just plain stupid? (your post is practically calling me stupid :rolleyes: )

The govt exonerated Toyota of all wrongdoing... that just shows how you can buy your way out of trouble. They KNEW the problem was in the ECU (computer) all along. But FIRST they blamed consumers saying they mistaken gas pedal for brake. THEN they blamed floor mats. ONLY AFTER a govt. investigation did they admit it was the ECU. This isn't the first time the a**holes have tried to blame their problems on consumers. A few years ago they had a problem with the valve heads having oil drain back holes that were too small which caused oil to gel up. First they blamed consumers saying they didn't change oil often enough meaning the consumer had to pay to rework the heads or pay for a new engine. Only after a class action lawsuit and the US govt stepping in did Toyota admit fault. How do I know this? I used to be a technician at a Toyota dealer. SCREW TOYOTA! Sorry for sounding harsh tongued, but people's and the media idiocy with this is ridiculous. The government should have banned Toyota from the US, but no all they do is pad some wallets and no harm, no foul... s***! :facepalm: :mad:

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Personal attacks aren't necessary.
Jesda wrote:Its why Toyota increased its fleet sales (even prior to the autopocalypse) to make up for falling retail sales. These days, you're almost as likely to get a Camry as the Enterprise counter as you are a Sebring or Impala.
And, sad as it sounds, the Impala's still the better option there. Especially with the brand-new LFX V6 it gets this year. The LS4 is also a nice option.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

JoeCool6972 wrote:[

The govt exonerated Toyota of all wrongdoing... that just shows how you can buy your way out of trouble. :

Do you have any proof that Toyota bribed NHTSA and NASA so they'd alter their findings?
Jesda wrote:I dont blame Toyota for the sticky throttle issue either. That's why I never made a thread on the topic, despite my disdain for the brand.

What was disturbing was how they handled the issue, burying it and hiding it instead of confronting it. They seemed more like 1960s GM than modern day Toyota. That cost them a lot of trust with American consumers who have inexplicably perceived Toyota as the vehicular return of Jesus Christ.

Its why Toyota increased its fleet sales (even prior to the autopocalypse) to make up for falling retail sales. These days, you're almost as likely to get a Camry at the Enterprise counter as you are a Sebring or Impala.
Jesda, I was under the impression that Toyota inherited a big chunk of fleet sales (especially to rental car companies) when GM and Ford decided to cut back on their fleet sales a couple years ago, providing Toyota an easy opportunity.

As far as trust with American consumers, I agree confidence among Toyota owners/buyers were shaken during the recall, but judging by the rebound in sales, the exoneration by NHTSA, barring any new news of bribery, it appears that negativity is dissipating.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:Jesda, I was under the impression that Toyota inherited a big chunk of fleet sales (especially to rental car companies) when GM and Ford decided to cut back on their fleet sales a couple years ago, providing Toyota an easy opportunity.

As far as trust with American consumers, I agree confidence among Toyota owners/buyers were shaken during the recall, but judging by the rebound in sales, the exoneration by NHTSA, barring any new news of bribery, it appears that negativity is dissipating.
That was a part of it, but retail sales dropped sharply, market share shrank, and earnings dropped by a third even before the earthquake. Signs of decline were evident before the autopocalypse of 2008 and 2009. Toyota soon learned, like Chrysler and GM, that all the fleet sales in the world couldn't make up for individual buyers who have quietly moved on.

And the competition from Korea won't make it easy to win back the "I refuse to buy American" crowd that typically flocked to Honda and Toyota. For many, Korean and Japanese are all the same and Toyota is perceived as a slight risk.

Toyota's management have acknowledged that returning to their former position in the US market will be an uphill battle. Its going to take style, competitive pricing, and driving pleasure to compensate for the loss of perceived quality, safety, and dependability (regardless of whether that perception is based on truth). Building beige won't cut it anymore, thankfully.




Toyota does have at least a couple families who will be forever loyal:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyuxqcSClrw[/youtube]

User avatar
Solar_Runner
Posts: 914
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm
Location: Rio Rancho, NM

Post

Hi, my name is George and I'm a Toyota fan. It's been 4 hours since I've last driven a Toyota.... oh crap! Wrong forum! :couch . Anyways, having said all that and jumping past the overly assertive newb, there's not much I like about the new Camie, except maybe the wheels. Back to the drawing board, fellas.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Hello, Honda front-end. How did you manage to wind up with a Corolla tail?

That said, it's neutral. I don't dislike it, but as Jesda said, it's a very "beige" car (despite Toyota's attempts to be "edgy").

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

AZhitman wrote:(despite Toyota's attempts to be "edgy").
ROFL. Toyota's definition of "edgy" is the same as Pontiacs: glue on more plastic.

Image

WHY

ARE

THEY

TRIANGLES

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: ROFL. Toyota's definition of "edgy" is the same as Pontiacs: glue on more plastic.
LOL, so true. but when kids glue on similarlly obnoxious plastic stuff onto their 140 hp 240sx's, it's considered it hip.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Bubba1 wrote:LOL, so true. but when kids glue on similarlly obnoxious plastic stuff onto their 140 hp 240sx's, it's considered it hip.
Only among slow kids.

Likewise, the Corolla "S" is only cool among... slow kids. :crazy:

User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

Toyota = YAWN.

Am I the only one that thinks the only thing that Toyota manufactures that reminds me I have a pulse is the TRD Tundra?

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

I hope the FR-S doesn't suck... or maybe I do, in which case I hope Subaru's version doesn't suck.

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

For the FR-S, supposedly, with the help of Yamaha they recasted every engine part, including the engine block, so their engine sounds better than their Subaru counterpart.
They also shaped the dashboard ends so you do not need to cut it to install rollcages.
They seem to have put in a lot of effort, even into the smaller things.
I hope it doesn't suck.

User avatar
Solar_Runner
Posts: 914
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm
Location: Rio Rancho, NM

Post

Thinking a bit more, I'd have to ask to check the fog light delete box on this car, if I was made to drive one. The chrome across the grill looks like it came off of the TL.... It didn't work on it either.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Razi wrote:For the FR-S, supposedly, with the help of Yamaha they recasted every engine part, including the engine block, so their engine sounds better than their Subaru counterpart.
They also shaped the dashboard ends so you do not need to cut it to install rollcages.
They seem to have put in a lot of effort, even into the smaller things.
I hope it doesn't suck.
So you're saying the Subie will be cheaper, and sound like a subie. I'm sold.

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

:gotme

User avatar
Eikon
Posts: 6928
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:20 am
Car: 71 240z, 93 Supra TT
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Contact:

Post

It looks like a snowplow with those fog lights sticking out away from the wheels instead of wrapping around like they should.

It amazes me how some manufacturers just consistently suck at styling.. I'm thinking Pontiac, Chrysler, Toyota.. They just don't get it! Even Hyundai is starting to figure it out... but not those three..

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

I don't think we have to worry about Pontiac sucking with their new car styling anytime soon.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Doesn't matter. This will haunt my nightmares for eternity.

Image

User avatar
Solar_Runner
Posts: 914
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:27 pm
Location: Rio Rancho, NM

Post

my eyes...


Return to “General Chat”